Bug 1056772

Summary:	Provide the Oracle ASMlib kernel module on 6.5.
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6	Reporter:	Linda Wang <lwang>
Component:	Driver Update Disk	Assignee:	Weiping Pan <wpan>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Red Hat Kernel QE team <kernel-qe>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	6.5	CC:	andriusb, benl, ccui, coughlan, jkurik, lwang, pchavan, ruyang, sibu, snagar, tarmstro, tlavigne, tmichael, vanhoof
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	6.4
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:	DUP
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	902493
Clones:	1061464 1063526 (view as bug list)		Environment:
Last Closed:	2014-02-10 20:11:41 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	902493
Bug Blocks:	906063, 1061464, 1063526, 1063527, 1063558, 1301989

Comment 3 Weiping Pan 2014-01-24 07:05:43 UTC

Hi, Afom,

Version 2.0.6
http://people.redhat.com/wpan/rhel6/rhel6.5/oracleasm/2.0.6/

Version 2.0.8
http://people.redhat.com/wpan/rhel6/rhel6.5/oracleasm/2.0.8/
In this version I modify a lot to make it compile on RHEL6.5 kernel.

Please help me test the function of it.

thanks
Weiping Pan

Comment 4 Andrius Benokraitis 2014-01-24 16:14:39 UTC

Making bug public to ease the tracking of this.

Note to all customers: RHEL 6.4 was the first release this kmod was built, and unfortunately this was missed as an action item in RHEL 6.5. We are working to get this corrected ASAP in this bug and updated workflow to have this included in the normal development for 6.6, 6.7, and 6,8. Thanks!

Comment 5 Andrius Benokraitis 2014-02-04 20:11:02 UTC

Any ETA for release of this on 6.5.z?

Comment 6 Linda Wang 2014-02-05 17:01:20 UTC

per afom, testing will be done by Thursday, 2/6/14.

move bz to MODIFIED to create erratum.. thanks!

Comment 8 Weiping Pan 2014-02-07 06:52:41 UTC

per afom,

"Hello all,

I have completed testing both packages and didn't run into any issue -
attached are test report - both very similar.

One minor thing I noticed is that when querying the packages, both
Signature & Vendor are blank.

As for recommendation, my test didn't uncover anything for me to
recommend one over the other. 

Regards,
Afom"

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2014-02-10 20:11:41 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2014-0152.html