Bug 105884
| Summary: | RFE: package libipq for iptables | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Idcmp <redhat> |
| Component: | iptables | Assignee: | Thomas Woerner <twoerner> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Ben Levenson <benl> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | gczarcinski |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | i386 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2003-10-23 14:23:26 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
*** Bug 106101 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** OK, this is pretty simple. Is this going to be resolved in time for FC1. Furthermore, at this time shouldn't the product be changed to Fedora? Including libipq opens the way for people to create packages for personal firewall applications. Fixed in 1.2.8-13. Probably bad form to spam just to say thank you, but, well, thank you! :-) |
Please include an iptables-devel package that includes something like: %files devel %defattr(-,root,root,0755) %{_mandir}/*/ipq* %{_mandir}/*/libipq* /usr/include/* /%{_lib}/libipq.* and possibly: /%{_lib}/libiptc.* /%{_lib}/libipulog.*