Bug 1059897

Summary:	Support 64-bit /SYM64/ symbol table
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6	Reporter:	Ed Santiago <santiago>
Component:	elfutils	Assignee:	Mark Wielaard <mjw>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Martin Cermak <mcermak>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	6.6	CC:	alanm, bhubbard, drepper, mbenitez, mcermak, mikem, mjw, rousseau, xdmoon
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	elfutils-0.152-2.el6	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:	Cause: eu-readelf was unable to read (some) 64-bit (s390x) ar archive files because it didn't supported the special entry /SYM64/ Consequence: eu-readelf would report "not a valid ELF file". Fix: Support for reading ar archives that contain special /SYM64/ entries has been added. Result: eu-readelf will properly read 64-bit ar archives.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2014-10-14 06:42:28 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1023566, 1054486

Description Ed Santiago 2014-01-30 21:15:55 UTC

eu-readelf 0.152 is unable to read (some) 64-bit s390x archives:

   not a valid ELF file

This blocks internal testing.

The fix is, I believe, commit e1873141a517738d8c50923e40525bb2ae6db68a.

Comment 2 Mark Wielaard 2014-01-30 21:54:21 UTC

This was fedora bug #843019 for which Petr wrote a fix which was accepted upstream and part of elfutils 0.155 (indeed the commit mentioned in the description). He also wrote a backport against the fedora elfutils package elfutils-0.154-sym64.patch

Comment 15 errata-xmlrpc 2014-10-14 06:42:28 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2014-1472.html