Bug 106281

Summary: sundance module not included in package
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: Adam Bowns <adam>
Component: kernelAssignee: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 9CC: riel
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-05-26 13:01:52 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Adam Bowns 2003-10-04 19:13:14 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030703

Description of problem:
The sundance module was not included in the package, I had to build it from
source and install it manually. Could we have it included in the next release ?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
kernel-2.6.0-0.test6.1.48.i686.rpm

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. install kernel-2.6.0-0.test6.1.48.i686.rpm
2. make sure "alias eth0 sundance" is in /etc/modprobe.conf
3. boot the new kernel
    

Actual Results:  Net services fail on bootup because they cannot init eth0 due
to the sundance module not being loaded. I also tried a manual "modprobe
sundance" and that couldn't locate the module either, and to make sure i double
checked the /lib/modules/2.6.0-0.test6.1.48/kernel/drivers/net/ directory for
any reference to sundance and there was non, so as far as I can tell it's
missing from the package. 

Expected Results:  All the net services should boot fine and eth0 should
function normally using the sundance module.

Additional info:

I built the sundance module with the source from
kernel-source-2.6.0-0.test6.1.48.i386.rpm and installed it and it is now working
fine with my dlink dfe-550tx card.

Comment 1 Arjan van de Ven 2003-10-06 07:22:04 UTC
It'll be in the kernel-unsupported rpm instead...