Bug 1062925
Summary: | [RFE] Enable large Discrete Logarithm Diffie-Hellman groups | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Peter Backes <rtc> |
Component: | openssl | Assignee: | Tomas Mraz <tmraz> |
Status: | CLOSED UPSTREAM | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | calestyo, dimitris.on.linux, hkario, redhat-bugzilla, robert.scheck, tmraz |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2017-01-10 11:03:46 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Peter Backes
2014-02-08 19:27:48 UTC
Please report this issue upstream. Note that computations with such large DH moduli are extremely slow and CPU cycle consuming so this means they are not too useful anyway. (In reply to Tomas Mraz from comment #1) > Please report this issue upstream. Note that computations with such large DH > moduli are extremely slow and CPU cycle consuming so this means they are not > too useful anyway. This is incorrect, as noted already in bug 1010607. You may have these issues with ephemeral RSA keys, but they don't apply to discrete logarithm Diffie-Hellman. The only minor issue it has is the (moderate) amount of data transferred during key exchange.... Which is why elliptic curves are now preferred. But large Discrete Logarithm Diffie-Hellman group sizes should work anyway. Anything new here? Has this been forwarded upstream? This is request for a new upstream feature and it would be best handled within OpenSSL upstream. Please report it to OpenSSL project in: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues Not sure what (or if something) has happened here regards taking this report to upstream, filed https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/2558 now. |