Bug 1063030
| Summary: | Update to debhelper-9.20131227 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Sandro Mani <manisandro> |
| Component: | debhelper | Assignee: | Oron Peled <oron> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | oron, sergio |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | debhelper-9.20131227-2.fc20 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2014-03-04 06:40:06 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Sandro Mani
2014-02-09 17:10:31 UTC
Hi, I review this package but I don't have commit permissions for this package. debhelper-9.20131227 is already used in testing of Debian [¹] . So I agree in update this package at least for F21 . Oron, if you are very busy please accept me has committer in https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/debhelper [¹] http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=debhelper regarding comment #1 * Sergio, you are approved as committer to debhelper. (sorry for delaying this for so long). * I agree with you that Debian/stable long-release cycle doesn't match Fedora's * IMO, it's best to follow Debian/testing with all our deb* packages. - This is because Debian/stable release cycle is very long and doesn't match Fedora release cycle. - I think it's reasonable for both rawhide and current version (F20, F21 in our case). - With previous version (F19) we may choose to be more conservative and stop its updates when it's neer EOL. So you keep up to date with testing in rawhide an F20, but leave as-is in old-stable (except for security backports and critical bugs)? Just asking, so that I can follow the same practice with my debian related packages. debhelper-9.20131227-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/debhelper-9.20131227-1.fc20 Package debhelper-9.20131227-1.fc20: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing debhelper-9.20131227-1.fc20' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-2249/debhelper-9.20131227-1.fc20 then log in and leave karma (feedback). (In reply to Oron Peled from comment #2) > regarding comment #1 > > * Sergio, you are approved as committer to debhelper. > (sorry for delaying this for so long). no worries (In reply to Sandro Mani from comment #3) > So you keep up to date with testing in rawhide an F20, but leave as-is in > old-stable (except for security backports and critical bugs)? Just asking, > so that I can follow the same practice with my debian related packages. Well , after debhelper-9.20131227 hit stable repo and no one complains, I will build that version for F19 ... debhelper-9.20131227-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/debhelper-9.20131227-2.fc20 debhelper-9.20131227-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |