Bug 1063048

Summary:	Review Request: rubygem-eventmachine_httpserver - EventMachine HTTP Server
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Nitesh Narayan Lal <niteshnarayan>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	mmorsi, msuchy, niteshnarayan, niteshnarayanlalleo, package-review
Target Milestone:	---	Flags:	niteshnarayanlalleo: needinfo+
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-02-02 16:02:25 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Nitesh Narayan Lal 2014-02-09 18:06:54 UTC

Spec URL: http://niteshnarayan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/rubygem-eventmachine_httpserver-0.2.1.spec
SRPM URL: http://niteshnarayan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/rubygem-eventmachine_httpserver-0.2.1-1.fc19.src.rpm
Description: Simple http server.
Fedora Account System Username:niteshnarayan

Comment 1 Mo Morsi 2014-03-02 13:14:26 UTC

Hey Nitesh some comments:

- Spec file name should be 'rubygem-eventmachine_httpserver.spec'

- %description should be a bit more descriptive than "Simple http server." Unfortunately there is not alot by ways of documentation in this gem but perhaps you could just write a sentence or two describing what it is, how it relates to event machine and stuff like "faster than other web servers" "non-rfc-strict parser" etc (just wouldn't reference other web servers like "thin" or "mongrel" specifically)

- The rspec command should be "rspec -Ilib spec"

- The %{gem_instdir}/eventmachine_httpserver.gemspec.* files should be rm'd or excluded

- The test dir and Rakefile should be rm'd, excluded, or marked as %doc

- This package is missing a LICENSE file, it should be included

Comment 2 Miroslav Suchý 2015-01-15 10:27:00 UTC

Ping? Any progress?

Comment 3 Mo Morsi 2015-02-02 16:02:25 UTC

Nitesh conveyed to me via email that he is no longer interested in working on this. Sorry for the belated response