Bug 1063451

Summary: [RFE]Jenkins builders do not use filesystem size from application
Product: OpenShift Online Reporter: Ben Parees <bparees>
Component: ImageAssignee: Ben Parees <bparees>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: libra bugs <libra-bugs>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 2.xCC: gideon, xtian
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-02-26 21:03:41 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Ben Parees 2014-02-10 18:44:19 UTC 
Description of problem:
When a jenkins builder application is created, it currently uses the gear size which was configured when the jenkins-client cartridge was added which in turn drives the filesystem size.

Instead, the builder application should be created using the current filesystem size of the application it is building (but not the gear size as the additional memory should not be needed)


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create an application with jenkins enabled
2. Add additional storage to the gear
3. Make a change to the application and push it 
4. Check if the builder gear also has the additional storage available.

Actual results:
The builder gear does not have any additional storage

Expected results:
The builder gear has the same additional storage as the app being built
Comment 1 gideon 2014-02-12 18:54:30 UTC 
Why is it presumed that the extra storage on the app gear is needed for building, rather than application data?
Comment 2 Ben Parees 2014-02-12 19:28:23 UTC 
it's not presumed, but if the app needs additional storage it's at least an indicator that the build may need additional storage too (due to either the source or binary sizes), so it makes sense to ensure that storage is available during the build.
Comment 3 Ben Parees 2014-03-11 18:23:07 UTC 
JIRA for enhancement to the java client to support the additional storage apis (prereq for this bug):
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/OSJC-101
Comment 4 JBoss JIRA Server 2014-10-15 16:23:36 UTC 
Andre Dietisheim <adietish> updated the status of jira OSJC-101 to Closed