Bug 1066027

Same issue (compressed manpages) as with 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066029

you can modernize your spec, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066026#c2

I have fixed CMakeLists.txt so that it does not compress man pages.

Spec URL: http://kdudka.fedorapeople.org/csdiff/csdiff.spec
SRPM URL: http://kdudka.fedorapeople.org/csdiff/csdiff-1.0.2-1.el6.src.rpm

(In reply to Kamil Dudka from comment #3)
> I have fixed CMakeLists.txt so that it does not compress man pages.
> 
> Spec URL: http://kdudka.fedorapeople.org/csdiff/csdiff.spec
> SRPM URL: http://kdudka.fedorapeople.org/csdiff/csdiff-1.0.2-1.el6.src.rpm

Please do the modernization via comment 2.

(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #4)
> Please do the modernization via comment 2.

Done.  Thank you for taking the review!

Spec URL: http://kdudka.fedorapeople.org/csdiff/csdiff.spec
SRPM URL: http://kdudka.fedorapeople.org/csdiff/csdiff-1.0.2-2.el6.src.rpm

Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated




===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
     "GPL", "Unknown or generated". 2 files have unknown license. Detailed
     output of licensecheck:

GPL
---
csdiff-1.0.2/abstract-filter.cc
csdiff-1.0.2/abstract-filter.hh
csdiff-1.0.2/abstract-parser.cc
csdiff-1.0.2/abstract-parser.hh
csdiff-1.0.2/abstract-writer.cc
csdiff-1.0.2/abstract-writer.hh
csdiff-1.0.2/csdiff-core.cc
csdiff-1.0.2/csdiff-core.hh
csdiff-1.0.2/csdiff.cc
csdiff-1.0.2/csfilter.cc
csdiff-1.0.2/csfilter.hh
csdiff-1.0.2/csgrep.cc
csdiff-1.0.2/cshtml.cc
csdiff-1.0.2/cslinker.cc
csdiff-1.0.2/csparser.cc
csdiff-1.0.2/csparser.hh
csdiff-1.0.2/cssort.cc
csdiff-1.0.2/cswriter.cc
csdiff-1.0.2/cswriter.hh
csdiff-1.0.2/cwe-mapper.cc
csdiff-1.0.2/cwe-mapper.hh
csdiff-1.0.2/defect.hh
csdiff-1.0.2/deflookup.cc
csdiff-1.0.2/deflookup.hh
csdiff-1.0.2/defqueue.cc
csdiff-1.0.2/defqueue.hh
csdiff-1.0.2/gcc-parser.cc
csdiff-1.0.2/gcc-parser.hh
csdiff-1.0.2/html-writer.cc
csdiff-1.0.2/html-writer.hh
csdiff-1.0.2/instream.cc
csdiff-1.0.2/instream.hh
csdiff-1.0.2/json-parser.cc
csdiff-1.0.2/json-parser.hh
csdiff-1.0.2/json-writer.cc
csdiff-1.0.2/json-writer.hh
csdiff-1.0.2/make-srpm.sh
csdiff-1.0.2/pycsdiff.cc
csdiff-1.0.2/version.hh

Unknown or generated
--------------------
csdiff-1.0.2/import-boost.sh
csdiff-1.0.2/tests/sync-diff.sh

[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
     supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
     in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
     for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
     are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
     in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
     from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL).
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is
     arched.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: csdiff-1.0.2-2.fc21.i686.rpm
          csdiff-1.0.2-2.fc21.src.rpm
csdiff.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US csgrep -> cs grep, cs-grep, grep
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
# rpmlint csdiff
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
# echo 'rpmlint-done:'



Requires
--------
csdiff (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    libboost_program_options.so.1.54.0
    libboost_regex.so.1.54.0
    libc.so.6
    libgcc_s.so.1
    libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)
    libm.so.6
    libstdc++.so.6
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)



Provides
--------
csdiff:
    csdiff
    csdiff(x86-32)



Source checksums
----------------
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/codescan-diff.git/snapshot/csdiff-1.0.2.tar.xz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : d2f286a34abc4349d755fd91f21499e6bc5c2e9ebba098cb3b724d3c21264ea5
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : d2f286a34abc4349d755fd91f21499e6bc5c2e9ebba098cb3b724d3c21264ea5


Generated by fedora-review 0.5.1 (bb9bf27) last change: 2013-12-13
Command line :/bin/fedora-review -rvn csdiff-1.0.2-2.el6.src.rpm
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-i386
Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG

------------------------
PACKAGE APPROVED.

Thanks for the review!

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: csdiff
Short Description: Non-interactive tools for processing code scan results in plain-text
Owners: kdudka
Branches: f19 f20 el6 epel7
InitialCC:

Git done (by process-git-requests).

csdiff-1.0.2-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/csdiff-1.0.2-2.el6

csdiff-1.0.2-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/csdiff-1.0.2-2.fc19

csdiff-1.0.2-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/csdiff-1.0.2-2.fc20

Package csdiff-1.0.2-2.el6:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=epel-testing csdiff-1.0.2-2.el6'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0666/csdiff-1.0.2-2.el6
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

csdiff-1.0.2-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

csdiff-1.0.2-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

csdiff-1.0.2-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.