Bug 1067009

Summary: [abrt] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 3740 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c:125 gen6_gt_check_fifodbg.isra.9+0x38/0x50 [i915]()
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Joe Doss <joe>
Component: xorg-x11-drv-intelAssignee: Adam Jackson <ajax>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 20CC: ajax, benjamin.masse, dvanbale, dvarga, gansalmon, itamar, jonathan, jon.dufresne, jones.peter.busi, kernel-maint, kubrick, ltcgcw, madhu.chinakonda, mailings, ragodrone, sagarun, spam, tom.georgoulias, xgl-maint
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Unspecified   
URL: https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/reports/bthash/b417f228447faa8770579481095748c9b2b37300
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:d723972606eec457191234af343e41fee56acb4d
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-11-18 19:48:47 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: dmesg none

Description Joe Doss 2014-02-19 14:02:49 UTC 
Description of problem:
Woke X230 from sleep and this happened.

Additional info:
reporter:       libreport-2.1.12
WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 3740 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c:125 gen6_gt_check_fifodbg.isra.9+0x38/0x50 [i915]()
MMIO read or write has been dropped ffffffff
Modules linked in: tun rfcomm ccm fuse ip6t_rpfilter ip6t_REJECT 8021q garp fcoe mrp libfcoe libfc scsi_transport_fc scsi_tgt xt_conntrack ebtable_nat ebtable_broute bridge stp llc ebtable_filter ebtables ip6table_nat nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_nat_ipv6 ip6table_mangle ip6table_security ip6table_raw ip6table_filter ip6_tables iptable_nat nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 nf_nat_ipv4 nf_nat nf_conntrack iptable_mangle iptable_security iptable_raw bnep snd_hda_codec_hdmi iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support snd_hda_codec_realtek arc4 iwldvm mac80211 x86_pkg_temp_thermal coretemp uvcvideo kvm_intel kvm snd_hda_intel iwlwifi videobuf2_vmalloc videobuf2_memops snd_hda_codec videobuf2_core btusb videodev snd_hwdep snd_seq media bluetooth snd_seq_device microcode snd_pcm i2c_i801 e1000e cfg80211 serio_raw sdhci_pci sdhci snd_page_alloc mmc_core mei_me thinkpad_acpi snd_timer mei lpc_ich ptp snd shpchp mfd_core soundcore pps_core rfkill wmi binfmt_misc dm_crypt crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul i915 crc32c_intel i2c_algo_bit drm_kms_helper ghash_clmulni_intel drm i2c_core video ecryptfs encrypted_keys trusted tpm
CPU: 3 PID: 3740 Comm: kworker/u16:14 Not tainted 3.13.3-201.fc20.x86_64 #1
Hardware name: LENOVO 2320HNU/2320HNU, BIOS G2ET82WW (2.02 ) 09/11/2012
Workqueue: i915 gen6_force_wake_work [i915]
 0000000000000009 ffff88039d5c3d38 ffffffff81686b48 ffff88039d5c3d80
 ffff88039d5c3d70 ffffffff8106d47d ffff880404dc0020 ffff880404dc0028
 0000000000000206 ffff8804048d3300 0000000000000200 ffff88039d5c3dd0
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff81686b48>] dump_stack+0x45/0x56
 [<ffffffff8106d47d>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7d/0xa0
 [<ffffffff8106d4ec>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4c/0x50
 [<ffffffff8109e157>] ? try_to_wake_up+0xe7/0x290
 [<ffffffffa0144b78>] gen6_gt_check_fifodbg.isra.9+0x38/0x50 [i915]
 [<ffffffffa0144c1b>] __gen6_gt_force_wake_mt_put+0x2b/0x30 [i915]
 [<ffffffffa0144947>] gen6_force_wake_work+0x37/0x50 [i915]
 [<ffffffff81087b86>] process_one_work+0x176/0x430
 [<ffffffff810887bb>] worker_thread+0x11b/0x3a0
 [<ffffffff810886a0>] ? rescuer_thread+0x350/0x350
 [<ffffffff8108f242>] kthread+0xd2/0xf0
 [<ffffffff8108f170>] ? insert_kthread_work+0x40/0x40
 [<ffffffff81695a7c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
 [<ffffffff8108f170>] ? insert_kthread_work+0x40/0x40
Comment 1 Joe Doss 2014-02-19 14:02:58 UTC 
Created attachment 865081 [details]
File: dmesg
Comment 2 Peter H. Jones 2014-04-29 20:05:02 UTC 
When I search bugzilla for "CPU PID", I get over a hundred similar-looking bug reports. Wouldn't it be a good idea to start finding groupsof truly similar reports and marking them as duplicates of one bug in the group?
Comment 3 Adam Jackson 2014-05-21 17:38:08 UTC 
*** Bug 1088631 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Adam Jackson 2014-11-18 19:48:47 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 960052 ***