Bug 1067341

Summary: Kernel: nfs: information leakage flaw
Product: [Other] Security Response Reporter: Prasad Pandit <ppandit>
Component: vulnerabilityAssignee: Red Hat Product Security <security-response-team>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact:
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: unspecifiedCC: agordeev, anton, aquini, bhu, davej, dhoward, esammons, fhrbata, gansalmon, iboverma, itamar, jforbes, jkacur, jkurik, jonathan, jross, jrusnack, jwboyer, kernel-maint, kernel-mgr, lgoncalv, lwang, madhu.chinakonda, matt, mcressma, nfs-maint, npajkovs, pholasek, plougher, rt-maint, rvrbovsk, rwheeler, williams
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Security
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-02-20 20:38:23 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Prasad Pandit 2014-02-20 09:27:52 UTC
Linux kernel build with the NFS file system(CONFIG_NFS_FS) along with the
support for NFSv4 protocol(CONFIG_NFS_V4) is vulnerable to an information
leakage flaw. It could occur while writing to a file wherein NFS server has
offered write delegation to the client. Such delegation allows NFS client to
perform the said operation locally without instant interaction with the server.

A user/program could use this flaw to leak kernel memory bytes.

Upstream fix:
-------------
  -> https://git.kernel.org/linus/263b4509ec4d47e0da3e753f85a39ea12d1eff24

Comment 1 Prasad Pandit 2014-02-20 09:37:03 UTC
Statement:

This issue does not affect the versions of the kernel package as shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 and Red Hat Enterprise MRG 2.

This issue affects the version of Linux kernel as shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6. Future kernel updates for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6  may address this issue.

Comment 2 Prasad Pandit 2014-02-20 20:38:23 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1066939 ***