Bug 1071981

Summary: introduce a SELinux boolean to enable/disable guest file access from qemu-ga
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Amos Kong <akong>
Component: selinux-policyAssignee: Miroslav Grepl <mgrepl>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Eduard Benes <ebenes>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 7.0CC: ailan, akong, dwalsh, ebenes, lcapitulino, mgrepl, mmalik, pbonzini
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: selinux-policy-3.13.1-6.el7 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 1154732 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-03-05 10:37:59 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1154732    

Comment 1 Daniel Walsh 2014-03-07 22:33:51 UTC 
Sure what does guest file access mean?  What files does it have to read? Write?
Comment 3 Miroslav Grepl 2014-09-18 14:19:48 UTC 
We have

manage_files_pattern(virt_qemu_ga_t, virt_qemu_ga_data_t, virt_qemu_ga_data_t)
manage_dirs_pattern(virt_qemu_ga_t, virt_qemu_ga_data_t, virt_qemu_ga_data_t)

for this purpose. 

Do you want to have virt_qemu_ga_read_data and virt_qemu_ga_manage_data boolean?
Comment 4 Amos Kong 2014-09-18 17:30:34 UTC 
Yes.
Comment 5 Miroslav Grepl 2014-10-15 11:04:29 UTC 
commit 9377f41fd5d8b29561aadc65ecbc955fe179e5be
Author: Miroslav Grepl <mgrepl>
Date:   Wed Oct 15 13:03:26 2014 +0200

    Add virt_read_qemu_ga_data/virt_rw_qemu_ga_data booleans to allow acces qemu-ga data only with these booleans.
Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2015-03-05 10:37:59 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0458.html