Bug 1072041
Summary: | Include a -devel that provides the docker source | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Vincent Batts <vbatts> |
Component: | docker-io | Assignee: | Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | admiller, bflad417, dwalsh, golang-updates, jkeck, lsm5, mattdm, mgoldman, skottler, vbatts |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2014-06-17 18:36:42 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Vincent Batts
2014-03-03 18:20:01 UTC
would it be better to use upstream tarball + whatever patches fedora needs or just the upstream tarball for the -devel package? Comments? Wouldn't this just be an expoded git repository with all of the patches used to build our shipping version of docker. This is fairly unusual in that we would usually tell people to just use the src-rpm. I think the src rpm should be enough for now. |