Bug 1073345

Summary:	Search for Open Files produce Glib-CRITICAL asserts only sometimes
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7	Reporter:	Tomas Pelka <tpelka>
Component:	gnome-system-monitor	Assignee:	David King <dking>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Desktop QE <desktop-qa-list>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	7.0	CC:	vhumpa
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	gnome-system-monitor-3.14.1-1.el7	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-11-19 07:23:33 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Tomas Pelka 2014-03-06 09:02:43 UTC

Description of problem:
Search for Open Files producing Glib-CRITICAL asserts: g_regex_match_full: assertion `regex != NULL' failed

This is expected since I'm searching for empty string/regexp, but it is happening just sometimes

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
gnome-system-monitor-3.8.2.1-5.el7

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. open g-s-m from cmd line, open Search for Open Files dialog
2. leave the search filed empty and hit Find
3. watch cmd line - there are lot of Glib-CRITICAL asserts dealing with regex
4. close Search for Open Files dialog
5. open it again
6. repeat step 2.

Actual results:
No more asserts full list of opened files displayed in Search results.

Expected results:
I would expect coherent behaviour

Additional info:

Comment 3 David King 2015-05-15 12:34:34 UTC

This does not seem to be a problem in the version included in the desktop rebase.

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2015-11-19 07:23:33 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2215.html