Bug 1075998

Summary: Segfault when changing address book
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Martin Simon <msimon>
Component: gnome-contactsAssignee: Alexander Larsson <alexl>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Desktop QE <desktop-qa-list>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 7.0CC: mclasen, tpelka, vbenes
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-11-19 07:23:36 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
gdb output none

Description Martin Simon 2014-03-13 10:58:01 UTC 
Created attachment 873919 [details]
gdb output

Description of problem:
When I try to change gnome-contacts address book few time ("try" because the change is not realtime, so still the same contacts are visible), I get segmentation fault.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
gnome-contacts-3.8.2-5.el7.x86_64

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open gnome-contacts
2. Open some contacts
3. Try to change address book few times (3-5 changes are more than enough)

Actual results:
segmentation fault

Expected results:
realtime change of address book (see bug 864017)

Additional info:
gdb output attached
Comment 1 Vladimir Benes 2015-05-15 13:25:43 UTC 
not reproducible in 3.14
Comment 3 Martin Simon 2015-09-02 12:05:44 UTC 
As in comment 1 I'm not able to reproduce it neither with gnome-contacts-3.14.2-2.el7.x86_64. I expect this bug was fixed with 3.14 rebase.
Comment 4 errata-xmlrpc 2015-11-19 07:23:36 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2215.html