Bug 1078103

Summary: Review Request: edit - A user friendly text editor for the Linux console/xterm
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Mohammed Isam <mohammed_isam1984>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: package-review, rc040203
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-03-20 15:39:44 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Mohammed Isam 2014-03-19 07:32:41 UTC
Spec URL: http://sites.google.com/site/mohammedisam2000/home/projects/edit.spec
SRPM URL: http://sites.google.com/site/mohammedisam2000/home/projects/edit-1.0-1.fc20.src.rpm
Description: EDIT is a text file editor for use with the Linux console/xterm. The idea was to provide a text editor that is user friendly and easy to use (especially for those who are experienced with the GUI interface). Having accustomed to SHIFT selecting text, using CTRL-shortcut keys and so on makes it hard for a regular joe to learn how to use other text based editor that need special syntaxes and hard (sometimes akward) commands that need memorizing. This is where edit comes to play. You don't need to learn any thing! Use it under Linux console or even the X system and editing configuration (and other text) files is just a breeze.
Fedora Account System Username: mohammedisam

Comment 1 Ralf Corsepius 2014-03-19 14:15:54 UTC
Some remarks:

- This package's name is causing me headaches. 
Do you think it's wise to call an arbitrary, so far mostly nonimportant editor "edit"? At least I don't and would recommend upstream to rename their package.

- Packaging-wise, there is one major issue with your *.spec:
Installation of the *.info file. Please check the Texinfo section in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets.

Comment 2 Mohammed Isam 2014-03-19 15:37:04 UTC
After renaming the package, will it need a new bugzilla bug report or this same bug number can be used (after editing of course)?
Checked and corrected the info part..

Comment 3 Mohammed Isam 2014-03-20 15:39:44 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1078960 ***