Bug 1078850

Summary: Satellite 5.4: CVE name changing syntax in 2014
Product: Red Hat Satellite 5 Reporter: Jan Dobes <jdobes>
Component: Satellite SynchronizationAssignee: Jan Dobes <jdobes>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Red Hat Satellite QA List <satqe-list>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 540CC: cperry, pstudeni, vdanen, xdmoon
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: spacewalk-backend-1.2.13-82 spacewalk-java-1.2.39-136 satellite-schema-5.4.0.28-1 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1075990 Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-04-23 12:16:31 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1075990, 1080985, 1081189    
Bug Blocks: 924189, 1078330    

Comment 3 Pavel Studeník 2014-04-14 11:15:16 UTC 
Verified with 
* satellite-schema-5.4.0.28-1.el5sat
* spacewalk-java-1.2.39-136.el5sat
* spacewalk-backend-1.2.13-82.el5sat

Reproducer was:
0. package satellite-schema-5.4.0.24-1.el5sat
1. satellite-sync -c rhel-i386-server-6 --no-rpms --no-packages --no-kickstart
2. mkdir dump
3. rhn-satellite-exporter -c rhel-i386-server-6 --dir dump/
4. edit file vim dump/errata/0/rhn-erratum-100.xml.gz
5. satellite-sync -m dump/ -c rhel-i386-server-6 --force-all-errata

SYNC ERROR: unhandled exception occurred:

(Check logs/email for potentially more detail)

(12899, 'ORA-12899: value too large for column "RHNSAT"."RHNCVE"."NAME" (actual: 16, maximum: 13)\n', 'insert into rhnCVE (id, name) values (:id, :name)')
Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2014-04-23 12:16:31 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0428.html