Bug 107978

Summary: DMA not available for hard drive on DEC HiNote Ultra 2000
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: David C. Shaw <dcshaw>
Component: kernelAssignee: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 9   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i586   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-09-30 15:41:39 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description David C. Shaw 2003-10-25 13:55:08 UTC
Description of problem:

DMA not available for the stock IBM hard drive on DEC HiNote Ultra 2000.  It IS
available under e.g. Windows NT.  Have to boot using ide=nodma or else enter
/sbin/hdparm -d0

An early symptom, maybe, is a message saying "BIOS not fully configured" and
"channel 00.08.00 unavailable" during boot.  I am running the latest DEC release
of the BIOS - v.1.07

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Linux v.9

How reproducible:

During installation - without entering "linux ide=nodma" installation is
pathologically slow.

Once installed - setting "/sbin/hdparm -d1" hangs the machine.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Either - try installing from CD with default procedure,
2. Or, try "/sbin/hdparm -d1"
3.
    
Actual results:

Pathologically slow performance

Expected results:

Faster performance than DMA disabled!

Additional info:

Latest BIOS from DEC (i.e. HP!) installed and hardware checked.  DMA works under
Windows NT.  "hdparm -I" shows that even udma2 should be available for this disk.

Comment 1 Bugzilla owner 2004-09-30 15:41:39 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. However, Red Hat no longer maintains this version of
the product. Please upgrade to the latest version and open a new bug if the problem
persists.

The Fedora Legacy project (http://fedoralegacy.org/) maintains some older releases, 
and if you believe this bug is interesting to them, please report the problem in
the bug tracker at: http://bugzilla.fedora.us/