Bug 1080382

Summary: tsung erlang lib directory is wrong on lib64
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart>
Component: tsungAssignee: Christopher Meng <i>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: erlang, i, lemenkov
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-07-10 16:23:20 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
tsung-lib64.patch
none
Add tsung-recorder prefix on lib64 none

Description Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2014-03-25 10:21:19 UTC
Description of problem:
The tsung erlang lib directory is wrong on lib64 when running the following command:

tsung-recorder -p webdav start



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
tsung-1.5.0-3.fc20.x86_64

How reproducible:
always with tsung-recorder

Steps to Reproduce:
1. tsung-recorder -p webdav start
2.
3.

Actual results:
Creating local Tsung directory /home/kwizart/.tsung
Creating Tsung log directory /home/kwizart/.tsung/log
Starting Tsung recorder on port 8090
$ {"init terminating in do_boot",{'cannot get bootfile','/usr/lib/erlang//lib/tsung_recorder-1.5.0/priv/tsung_recorder.boot'}}

Expected results:
don't know yet...

Additional info:

Comment 1 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2014-03-25 10:46:09 UTC
Created attachment 878381 [details]
tsung-lib64.patch

Comment 2 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2014-03-25 10:47:47 UTC
This patch is not enoght, might need additional changes.

Comment 3 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2014-05-07 08:59:33 UTC
Created attachment 893166 [details]
Add tsung-recorder prefix on lib64

Comment 4 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2014-06-02 18:36:40 UTC
Anyone to apply this patch ?

Comment 5 Christopher Meng 2014-07-10 16:23:20 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1056027 ***