Bug 1080968

Summary:	Review Request: gdcm - Grassroots DiCoM is a C++ library to parse DICOM medical files
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Nikos Georgopoulos <ngeorgop>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	i, package-review
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2014-03-26 12:05:52 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Nikos Georgopoulos 2014-03-26 12:01:21 UTC

Spec URL: http://ngeorgop.no-ip.biz/codos/SPECS/gdcm.spec
SRPM URL: http://ngeorgop.no-ip.biz/codos/SRPMS/gdcm-2.0.18-9.el6.src.rpm
Description: 
GDCM implements the dicom base standard part 5 that concentrates on image file
format. Hence GDCM supports the following formats:
- ACR-NEMA version 1 and 2 (huffman compression is not supported),
- DICOM version 3.0, including various encodings of JPEG - lossless & lossy-, 
RLE, J2K, deflated, JPEG-LS (very experimental) (MPEG2 compression is not 
supported)
- Papyrus V2 and V3 file headers should be readable, 

Fedora Account System Username:
ngeorgop

Comment 1 Christopher Meng 2014-03-26 12:05:52 UTC

What are you doing here?

Comment 2 Nikos Georgopoulos 2014-03-26 12:12:37 UTC

(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #1)
> What are you doing here?
sorry
did not mean to cause problems
it seems i need guidance...

Comment 3 Christopher Meng 2014-03-26 12:17:13 UTC

(In reply to Nikos Georgopoulos from comment #2)
> (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #1)
> > What are you doing here?
> sorry
> did not mean to cause problems
> it seems i need guidance...

No no no :)

Feel free to tell us your proposal here.

I closed it as this package is already in Fedora, but not in EPEL. I guess that you want it be available in EPEL repo, right?

If so, please open a bug against gdcm under Fedora, then tell the maintainer.

Thank you.