Bug 1082502

Summary:	[RFE][vdsm] Provide new Storage API without Master File-System persistency
Product:	[oVirt] vdsm	Reporter:	Federico Simoncelli <fsimonce>
Component:	RFEs	Assignee:	Allon Mureinik <amureini>
Status:	CLOSED DEFERRED	QA Contact:	Raz Tamir <ratamir>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	---	CC:	amureini, bazulay, bugs, lpeer, s.kieske, srevivo, ylavi
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	---	Flags:	ylavi: ovirt-future? rule-engine: planning_ack? rule-engine: devel_ack? rule-engine: testing_ack?
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2017-06-20 09:46:19 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	Storage	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1082498
Bug Blocks:	1080384

Description Federico Simoncelli 2014-03-31 08:10:21 UTC

Description of problem:
We should provide a new API for SPM-like operations (createVolume, copyImage, deleteImage, etc.) that is not relying on the master file-system persistency (see RFE bug 1080379).

Comment 1 Yaniv Lavi 2016-12-05 10:43:56 UTC

Do we still need this RFE, can we close it?

Comment 2 Yaniv Lavi 2016-12-05 10:44:41 UTC

*** Bug 1082503 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Allon Mureinik 2017-01-24 21:56:43 UTC

(In reply to Yaniv Dary from comment #1)
> Do we still need this RFE, can we close it?
Leave it for now, thanks.

Comment 4 Yaniv Kaul 2017-06-20 09:18:07 UTC

(In reply to Allon Mureinik from comment #3)
> (In reply to Yaniv Dary from comment #1)
> > Do we still need this RFE, can we close it?
> Leave it for now, thanks.

What do we intend to do with this RFE?