Bug 1083589
| Summary: | Review Request: jenkins-ssh-slaves-plugin - Jenkins SSH Slaves Plugin | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Michal Srb <msrb> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | gil cattaneo <puntogil> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | package-review, puntogil |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | puntogil:
fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+ |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | jenkins-ssh-slaves-plugin-1.6-1.fc21 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2014-04-03 05:29:10 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Michal Srb
2014-04-02 14:05:07 UTC
[ERROR] COMPILATION ERROR : [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------- [ERROR] /builddir/build/BUILD/ssh-slaves-plugin-ssh-slaves-1.6/src/main/java/hudson/plugins/sshslaves/SSHLauncher.java:[471,64] incompatible types: org.springframework.security.core.context.SecurityContext cannot be converted to org.acegisecurity.context.SecurityContext [ERROR] /builddir/build/BUILD/ssh-slaves-plugin-ssh-slaves-1.6/src/main/java/hudson/plugins/sshslaves/SSHLauncher.java:[797,19] cannot find symbol symbol: method exec(java.lang.String,java.io.ByteArrayOutputStream) location: variable connection of type com.trilead.ssh2.Connection [ERROR] /builddir/build/BUILD/ssh-slaves-plugin-ssh-slaves-1.6/src/main/java/hudson/plugins/sshslaves/SSHLauncher.java:[815,23] cannot find symbol symbol: method exec(java.lang.String,org.apache.commons.io.output.TeeOutputStream) location: variable connection of type com.trilead.ssh2.Connection [ERROR] /builddir/build/BUILD/ssh-slaves-plugin-ssh-slaves-1.6/src/main/java/hudson/plugins/sshslaves/SSHLauncher.java:[850,19] cannot find symbol symbol: method exec(java.lang.String,java.io.PrintStream) location: variable connection of type com.trilead.ssh2.Connection [ERROR] /builddir/build/BUILD/ssh-slaves-plugin-ssh-slaves-1.6/src/main/java/hudson/plugins/sshslaves/SSHLauncher.java:[1039,27] cannot find symbol symbol: method exec(java.lang.String,java.io.PrintStream) location: variable connection of type com.trilead.ssh2.Connection [ERROR] /builddir/build/BUILD/ssh-slaves-plugin-ssh-slaves-1.6/src/main/java/hudson/plugins/sshslaves/SSHLauncher.java:[1043,31] cannot find symbol symbol: method exec(java.lang.String,java.io.PrintStream) location: variable connection of type com.trilead.ssh2.Connection [ERROR] /builddir/build/BUILD/ssh-slaves-plugin-ssh-slaves-1.6/src/main/java/hudson/plugins/sshslaves/SSHLauncher.java:[1049,23] cannot find symbol symbol: method exec(java.lang.String,hudson.util.NullStream) location: variable connection of type com.trilead.ssh2.Connection [ERROR] /builddir/build/BUILD/ssh-slaves-plugin-ssh-slaves-1.6/src/main/java/hudson/plugins/sshslaves/SSHLauncher.java:[1062,19] cannot find symbol symbol: method exec(java.lang.String,java.io.PrintStream) location: variable connection of type com.trilead.ssh2.Connection [ERROR] /builddir/build/BUILD/ssh-slaves-plugin-ssh-slaves-1.6/src/main/java/hudson/plugins/sshslaves/SSHLauncher.java:[1070,19] cannot find symbol symbol: method exec(java.lang.String,java.io.ByteArrayOutputStream) location: variable connection of type com.trilead.ssh2.Connection [ERROR] /builddir/build/BUILD/ssh-slaves-plugin-ssh-slaves-1.6/src/main/java/hudson/plugins/sshslaves/SSHLauncher.java:[1165,39] cannot find symbol symbol: method exec(java.lang.String,java.io.PrintStream) location: variable connection of type com.trilead.ssh2.Connection [INFO] 10 errors Hi gil, Thanks for doing the review. The package builds fine in koji [1]. It needs latest versions of some of its dependencies which don't hit the mirrors yet. You can wait day or two, or you can download prebuilt RPMs from koji and run fedora-review with "-p". It's up to you. [1]: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6700199 (In reply to Michal Srb from comment #2) > Hi gil, > > Thanks for doing the review. The package builds fine in koji [1]. It needs > latest versions of some of its dependencies which don't hit the mirrors yet. > You can wait day or two, or you can download prebuilt RPMs from koji and run > fedora-review with "-p". It's up to you. > > > [1]: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6700199 for me is all right! use prebuilt RPMs right now Package Review
==============
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
=======
- Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
Note: jenkins-ssh-slaves-plugins.spec should be jenkins-ssh-slaves-
plugin.spec
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Spec_file_name
FIXME
- This seems like a Java package, please install fedora-review-plugin-java to
get additional checks
===== MUST items =====
Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla
upstream sources. No licenses found. Please check the source files for
licenses manually.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
Note: Using prebuilt rpms.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Java:
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic:
[!]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in jenkins-
ssh-slaves-plugin-javadoc
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[!]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL).
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic:
[!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Note: Bad spec filename: /home/gil/1083589-jenkins-ssh-slaves-plugin
/review-jenkins-ssh-slaves-plugins/srpm-unpacked/jenkins-ssh-slaves-
plugins.spec
See: (this test has no URL)
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: jenkins-ssh-slaves-plugin-1.6-1.fc21.noarch.rpm
jenkins-ssh-slaves-plugin-javadoc-1.6-1.fc21.noarch.rpm
jenkins-ssh-slaves-plugin-1.6-1.fc21.src.rpm
jenkins-ssh-slaves-plugin.src: E: invalid-spec-name
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
# rpmlint jenkins-ssh-slaves-plugin-javadoc jenkins-ssh-slaves-plugin
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
# echo 'rpmlint-done:'
Requires
--------
jenkins-ssh-slaves-plugin-javadoc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
jpackage-utils
jenkins-ssh-slaves-plugin (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
jpackage-utils
Provides
--------
jenkins-ssh-slaves-plugin-javadoc:
jenkins-ssh-slaves-plugin-javadoc
jenkins-ssh-slaves-plugin:
jenkins-ssh-slaves-plugin
mvn(org.jenkins-ci.plugins:ssh-slaves)
Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/jenkinsci/ssh-slaves-plugin/archive/ssh-slaves-1.6.tar.gz :
CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 197abc84d73cb4084400cb8bda007862f605d1cce85dd581c0723ed57a4e41ba
CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 197abc84d73cb4084400cb8bda007862f605d1cce85dd581c0723ed57a4e41ba
Generated by fedora-review 0.5.1 (bb9bf27) last change: 2013-12-13
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -vpn jenkins-ssh-slaves-plugin -m fedora-rawhide-i386
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-i386
Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, Java
Disabled plugins: C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG
Please, fix spec file name before import Fixed: Spec URL: http://msrb.fedorapeople.org/review/2/jenkins-ssh-slaves-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://msrb.fedorapeople.org/review/2/jenkins-ssh-slaves-plugin-1.6-1.fc21.src.rpm Thanks for the review. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: jenkins-ssh-slaves-plugin Short Description: Jenkins SSH Slaves Plugin Owners: msrb sochotni mizdebsk msimacek Branches: f20 InitialCC: java-sig Git done (by process-git-requests). In Rawhide, closing. Thanks for the review and the repo. |