Bug 1086925
| Summary: | snmpd does not report error when clientaddr <ip>:<port> cannot bind to the specified port | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Dalibor Pospíšil <dapospis> |
| Component: | net-snmp | Assignee: | Jan Safranek <jsafrane> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Dalibor Pospíšil <dapospis> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 7.0 | CC: | dapospis, jsafrane, ksrot, lmiksik |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Snapshot 4 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: |
Cause:
In one of the previous Net-SNMP updates we extended 'clientaddr' and 'clientaddrUsesPort' configuration options to allow system administrators to set specific port for outgoing SNMP requests. When this port number was not usable, for example it was already used, SNMP tools and daemons did not report any error and used random port for outgoing requests.
Consequence:
SNMP requests were sent from unexpected ports, while the system administrator did not know about it.
Fix:
Report an error that requested port cannot be used.
Result:
System admin knows that something is wrong.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | 886468 | Environment: | |
| Last Closed: | 2015-03-05 08:38:26 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 840861, 886468, 1877375 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Dalibor Pospíšil
2014-04-11 20:31:35 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0607.html |