Bug 1089161

Summary: Designer doesn't draw a process image correctly by using chrome ver34
Product: [JBoss] JBoss Enterprise BRMS Platform 5 Reporter: Hisao Furuichi <hfuruich>
Component: BRM (Guvnor)Assignee: Tihomir Surdilovic <tsurdilo>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Lukáš Petrovický <lpetrovi>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: BRMS 5.3.1CC: brms-jira, mbaluch
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-04-23 13:00:27 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
actual result
none
expected result
none
tested business process none

Description Hisao Furuichi 2014-04-18 07:04:03 UTC 
Created attachment 887441 [details]
actual result

Description of problem:
Designer doesn't draw a process image correctly by using chrome ver34. It works fine with Firefox ver28. 

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Start BRMS5.3.1
2.Create a process definition like attached defaultPackage.sampleprocess.bpmn2 
3.log on to guvnor using Chrome ver34
4.Open the created process using designer

Actual results:
Process image is not drawn correctly. //chrome34_defaultPackage.sampleprocess.png is attached

Expected results:
Process image is drawn correctly. //firefox20_defaultPackage.sampleprocess.png

Additional info:
Although chrome is not on the Certified Configurations list[1], please take a look at it.
[1] https://access.redhat.com/site/articles/119933#Cert_5_3
Comment 1 Hisao Furuichi 2014-04-18 07:05:06 UTC 
Created attachment 887442 [details]
expected result
Comment 2 Hisao Furuichi 2014-04-18 07:05:47 UTC 
Created attachment 887443 [details]
tested business process
Comment 3 Tihomir Surdilovic 2014-04-23 12:59:29 UTC 
this should be set as duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1088898
Comment 4 Tihomir Surdilovic 2014-04-23 13:00:27 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1088898 ***