Bug 1089490
| Summary: | [PATCH] AttributeError: NullTranslationsBabel instance has no attribute 'isactive' with Babel 1.3 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Paul Howarth <paul> | ||||
| Component: | trac | Assignee: | Felix Schwarz <fschwarz> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | 20 | CC: | fschwarz, gwync, lmacken | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | trac-1.0.2-2.fc20 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2014-11-18 12:34:54 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Paul Howarth
2014-04-19 17:55:55 UTC
The bad thing is that Trac 1.0.1 has test failures with Babel 1.3 so we have a FTBS here. I tried to manually cherry-pick the required fixes but it turns out that we need at least 4-5 other patches to make the test failures go away. I see two options to deal with the situation: - don't execute the tests on F20/rawhide - use 1.0.2dev directly from the svn As far as I can see most of the stuff in 1.0.2dev should be pretty stable including some nice bug fixes. However we might have to deal with some fallout and I don't have much time. Opinions? Is 1.0.2 likely to be released in the F21 time frame? If so, I think it's probably best to skip the tests on F20 and move to 1.0.2 in Rawhide. Do you think the patch I supplied would be OK for F20, so I could push a trac-accountmanager-plugin update for F20? 1.0.2 is likely but it seems as Trac releases are pretty rare these days (there was already talk of releasing it in December '13). It'd say it's 70% likely to happen before F21. The patch itself looks ok but I didn't tried to run it in a real trac environment. I'm leaning towards 1.0.2dev in rawhide (also because Trac's stable branch is usually really stable) + disabling tests in F20 as you suggested. Did you try out the patch in a trac environment for manual testing? (In reply to Felix Schwarz from comment #3) > 1.0.2 is likely but it seems as Trac releases are pretty rare these days > (there was already talk of releasing it in December '13). It'd say it's 70% > likely to happen before F21. > > The patch itself looks ok but I didn't tried to run it in a real trac > environment. > > I'm leaning towards 1.0.2dev in rawhide (also because Trac's stable branch > is usually really stable) + disabling tests in F20 as you suggested. Did you > try out the patch in a trac environment for manual testing? I'm using it on http://www.city-fan.org/cfo-trac/ but I'm pretty much the only user of it and it uses the accountmanager plugin so I don't know if there are any adverse effects in environments that don't use that plugin, or with other plugins. Any thoughts on how to progress this? Finally the Trac guys released 1.0.2 and 1.1.2 but I guess it's too late to update F21 at this point? I'll update Trac to 1.1.2 in rawhide but what should we do about F21? Any thoughts from your side? It looks to me like 1.0.2 is a maintenance release with lots of bugfixes that would be worth having in F-21. Looking at the release notes, I don't see any obvious incompatibilities. I'm leaning towards thinking the bugfixes would be worth it. Your call though. trac-1.0.2-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/trac-1.0.2-1.fc20 you're right - I misunderstood Trac's release model. I'll push updates to 1.0.2 for all supported Fedora versions. Package trac-1.0.2-1.fc20: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing trac-1.0.2-1.fc20' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-14057/trac-1.0.2-1.fc20 then log in and leave karma (feedback). trac-1.0.2-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/trac-1.0.2-2.fc21 trac-1.0.2-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/trac-1.0.2-2.fc20 just fyi: Trac 1.0.2 seems to trigger a bug in the Python bindings for subversion (see http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/11805) so I cherry-picked the Trac changeset from 1.0.3dev and rebuilt the package. The only downside is that it might take a bit longer until the version hits stable. trac-1.0.2-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/trac-1.0.2-2.fc19 Package trac-1.0.2-2.fc20: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing trac-1.0.2-2.fc20' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-14620/trac-1.0.2-2.fc20 then log in and leave karma (feedback). trac-1.0.2-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. trac-1.0.2-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. trac-1.0.2-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |