Bug 1091029

Summary: tzdata-java should support new tzdata file format used by OpenJDK8
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Omair Majid <omajid>
Component: tzdataAssignee: Patsy Griffin <pfrankli>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 22CC: ahughes, extras-orphan, mnewsome, pfrankli
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: tzdata-2014e-3.fc21 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 1097329 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-06-11 17:45:21 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1097329    
Attachments:
Description Flags
patch for spec file
none
further fix for the first patch none

Description Omair Majid 2014-04-24 16:33:40 UTC
Created attachment 889379 [details]
patch for spec file

tzdata-java supplies tzdata data in a format compatible with OpenJDK 6 and OpenJDK 7. However, OpenJDK 8 uses tzdata in a different format and can not use the format tzdata-java supplies.

tzdata-java should be updated to also supply tzdata in a format compatible with OpenJDK 8.

I have adapted the code used by OpenJDK 8 to create javazic version suitable for use with tzdata-java package

The tarball is at: http://omajid.fedorapeople.org/javazic-1.8-37392f2f5d59.tar.xz

Thanks!

Comment 1 Omair Majid 2014-05-08 22:03:22 UTC
Please let me know if there is anything I can do to make the inclusion of this patch in Fedora faster.

Comment 2 Omair Majid 2014-06-09 21:38:59 UTC
Created attachment 906654 [details]
further fix for the first patch

The first fix was incomplete. This is a further fix on top of that.

It fixes a mistake in the find command and makes sure that only two extra jdk-specific tz files are compiled.

Comment 3 Jaroslav Reznik 2015-03-03 17:12:57 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 22 development cycle.
Changing version to '22'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora22

Comment 4 Omair Majid 2015-06-11 17:33:05 UTC
Can this bug be closed? This has been fixed in both F21 and F22.

Thanks for pushing this fix everywhere!