Bug 1092648
Summary: | Negative value of nsSaslMapPriority is not reset to lowest priority | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Milan Kubík <mkubik> |
Component: | 389-ds-base | Assignee: | Noriko Hosoi <nhosoi> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Viktor Ashirov <vashirov> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 7.0 | CC: | amsharma, mreynolds, nkinder, rmeggins |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | 389-ds-base-1.3.3.1-1.el7 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2015-03-05 09:34:33 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Milan Kubík
2014-04-29 16:18:54 UTC
Upstream ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47791 Fix upstream for 7.1 [root@dhcp201-126 ~]# ldapmodify -p 389 -h localhost -D "cn=Directory Manager" -w Secret123 << EOF
> dn: cn=example map,cn=mapping,cn=sasl,cn=config
> changetype: add
> objectclass: top
> objectclass: nsSaslMapping
> cn: example map
> nsSaslMapPriority: -10
> nsSaslMapRegexString: \(.*\)
> nsSaslMapBaseDNTemplate: ou=People
> nsSaslMapFilterTemplate: (cn=\1)
> EOF
adding new entry "cn=example map,cn=mapping,cn=sasl,cn=config"
[root@dhcp201-126 ~]# ldapsearch -p 389 -h localhost -D "cn=Directory Manager" -w Secret123 -LLL -b "cn=example map,cn=mapping,cn=sasl,cn=config"
dn: cn=example map,cn=mapping,cn=sasl,cn=config
objectClass: top
objectClass: nsSaslMapping
cn: example map
nsSaslMapPriority: 100
nsSaslMapRegexString: \(.*\)
nsSaslMapBaseDNTemplate: ou=People
nsSaslMapFilterTemplate: (cn=\1)
error :: [08/Jan/2015:13:53:56 +051800] - sasl_map_config_parse_entry: resetting invalid nsSaslMapPriority value (-10) to the lowest priority (100)
Hence VERIFIED,
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0416.html |