Bug 1094602 (CVE-2014-0206)
Summary: | CVE-2014-0206 kernel: aio: insufficient sanitization of head in aio_read_events_ring() | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Other] Security Response | Reporter: | Petr Matousek <pmatouse> |
Component: | vulnerability | Assignee: | Red Hat Product Security <security-response-team> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | unspecified | CC: | agordeev, aquini, bhu, carnil, dhoward, esammons, fhrbata, iboverma, jkacur, jkurik, jmoyer, jross, kernel-mgr, lgoncalv, lwang, matt, mcressma, mguzik, nobody, npajkovs, pholasek, plougher, security-response-team, williams |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Security |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2014-07-22 20:01:46 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1094604, 1094605, 1094606, 1112975 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 1094607 |
Description
Petr Matousek
2014-05-06 06:39:19 UTC
Statement: This issue does not affect the Linux kernel packages as shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 and 6. This issue has been addressed in following products: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Via RHSA-2014:0786 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0786.html Proposed upstream patches: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/24/619 https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/24/623 Created kernel tracking bugs for this issue: Affects: fedora-all [bug 1112975] The comments on the patches claim to need a separate backport for v3.10 / v3.11, although they look like they would apply cleanly. Is this true? If so, when can we expect them? (In reply to John Kacur from comment #11) > The comments on the patches claim to need a separate backport for v3.10 / > v3.11, although they look like they would apply cleanly. Is this true? If > so, when can we expect them? They've already been posted upstream. http://www.spinics.net/lists/stable/msg51486.html http://www.spinics.net/lists/stable/msg51487.html kernel-3.14.9-200.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. This issue has been addressed in following products: MRG for RHEL-6 v.2 Via RHSA-2014:0913 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0913.html kernel-3.14.13-100.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |