Bug 109474
Summary: | glibc-kernheaders tcp.h invalid macro | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Warren Togami <wtogami> |
Component: | glibc-kernheaders | Assignee: | Dave Jones <davej> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Brian Brock <bbrock> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 1 | CC: | jakub, njs, notting, pfrields, roland |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2004-11-06 00:14:08 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Warren Togami
2003-11-08 09:37:40 UTC
I wanted to compile shfs. I ran into the "headers are hosed in glibc-kernheaders" bug, so I went looking for an upgrade. None were in any of the yum repositories, but I found glibc-kernheaders-2.4-9.1.84.i386.rpm at a shadow in Czechoslovakia, (yes, the signature checked) and, of course, it will still not compile, but for other reasons. Why is this not considered important enought to release a fix for? Or even to have an update in updates-testing? If the places in yum.conf or their shadows are wrong, where should I be looking? shfs is a kernel module; it cannot use the headers from glibc-kernheaders anyway! This seems fixed in FC3. |