Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1095809

Summary:	Unwanted and misleading SSL info messages on qpidd service startup
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise MRG	Reporter:	Justin Ross <jross>
Component:	qpid-cpp	Assignee:	Andrew Stitcher <astitcher>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Frantisek Reznicek <freznice>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	Development	CC:	astitcher, esammons, freznice, jmorgan, jross, pematous, zkraus
Target Milestone:	3.0	Keywords:	Regression
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Known Issue
Doc Text:	It was discovered that misleading SSL messages appeared in logs if the HA Module was loaded into the Broker and logging was turned up to INFO or higher. Messages similar to the following are displayed: "2014-04-29 10:17:34 [Security] info SSL connector not enabled, you must set QPID_SSL_CERT_DB to enable it." This message is harmless. The message is not referring to the regular SSL functionality of the broker: it is referring to the outgoing client functionality of the HA client. There is no workaround to this issue, except to disregard this message if it appears in the logs.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	1092621	Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-01-21 12:52:28 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1092621
Bug Blocks:

Comment 6 Petr Matousek 2014-08-20 16:12:52 UTC

Release note added. the defect is tracked as Bug 1092621.

Red Hat Enterprise Messaging 3.0 Release Notes (Mon Aug 18 2014)
Built from Content Specification: 22896, Revision: 699608

-> VERIFIED

Comment 8 Petr Matousek 2014-09-09 08:51:36 UTC

Hello Justin, Andrew,
  may I possibly ask you for creating doctext (CCFR form), please? This defect is private and as Jared pointed out in comment 7 it would be optimal to have complete doctext.

Comment 13 Frantisek Reznicek 2014-09-22 07:53:50 UTC

We reached acceptance criteria for this defect, defect is now public and listed in release notes.

-> VERIFIED

Comment 15 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-14 02:07:34 UTC

The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days