Bug 1096418

Summary:	New upstream version available
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Changwoo Ryu <cwryu>
Component:	nhn-nanum-fonts	Assignee:	Daiki Ueno <dueno>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	dueno, fonts-bugs, i18n-bugs
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	naver-nanum-fonts-3.020-10.20131007.fc22	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2014-07-10 07:07:02 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1097985
Bug Blocks:

Description Changwoo Ryu 2014-05-10 00:01:32 UTC

Description of problem:

New upstream release is available at http://hangeul.naver.com/ .  You can download NanumFontSetup_TTF_ALL_hangeulcamp.exe and it can be extracted using 7z.

It includes new NanumBarunGothic family and adds Light weight for NanumGothic. Unfortunately Naver did not put any version on this release.. FYI, Debian package used the modified date "20131007".

See http://help.naver.com/ops/step2/faq.nhn?faqId=15879 for the SIL OFL 1.1 license. It updates Reserved Font Names.

Note that the upstream company NHN has been split into several companies and now "Naver" is now the name of company in charge of Nanum fonts.



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Daiki Ueno 2014-05-15 03:50:57 UTC

Hi Changwoo,

Thanks for the nice report with helpful information.

(In reply to Changwoo Ryu from comment #0)
> Note that the upstream company NHN has been split into several companies and
> now "Naver" is now the name of company in charge of Nanum fonts.

Hmm, then it seems the Fedora package needs to be renamed, according to our packaging guideline.  I've just filed a rename review for this:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1097985

Comment 2 Daiki Ueno 2014-07-10 07:07:02 UTC

I've built the renamed package from the latest upstream.  Closing.