Bug 109720 (mono)
Summary: | Request for Enhancement: Add Mono 1.0 in 2004 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jonathan Pryor <jonpryor> | ||||
Component: | basesystem | Assignee: | Karen Bennet <bennet> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED DEFERRED | QA Contact: | |||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | 1 | CC: | hp, john.luke, k.georgiou, leonard.peterson, mitr, notting, veillard | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature | ||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
URL: | http://www.mono-project.com | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2004-07-20 16:12:51 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Jonathan Pryor
2003-11-11 12:32:45 UTC
I think it is obvious that it should be included in some pre-release form to better make sure that the inclusion is performed in a correct way. E.g. how will the Global Assembly Cache issue be solved? It's on their roadmap. This is a project decision: http://www.go-mono.net/mono-hacking-roadmap.html whatever they decide is likely to be the way it is implemented within Fedora. Daniel I'm not sure what you mean by "Global Assembly Cache issue", but the current verdict is that gacutil.exe will be the only supported method of adding assemblies to the GAC. Period. (Unless someone comes up with a *really* good reason not to, and saving disk space is NOT a *really* good reason.) This means that any RPM that wants to install an assembly into the GAC must run ``gacutil -i'' in a post-install script. So 1.0 was released, any chance this is going to be accepted into Fedora? I would be happy to act as an intermediary between mono and fedora to make this happen, if necessary. From the sound of Havoc Pennington's blog (for which I'm too lazy to look up; just hit Google), the release of 1.0 isn't enough. The primary issue holding things back is our favorite topic: patent licenses. The only thing that will be enough is a written gaurantee/assurance from Microsoft, Intel, IBM, and anyone else involved in the ECMA standards stating that any patents required by the ECMA standards are (1) Royalty Free, and (2) usable by Free Software, so none of that silly Microsoft Office 2003 XML file format crap which, while royalty free, required adding a disclaimer to your software stating (paraphrasing) "This software may use patents owned by Microsoft." That requirement prevents Free Software from reading the file formats, as it's unknown which patents are involved, and the disclaimer is an added requirement, which is against the GPL. At this point, no. Created attachment 328973 [details]
error log
New install of Fedora 9. Left running and this was on the screen
|