Bug 1097205
Summary: | rubygem-rack version in EPEL has many CVEs, please update | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | sean.edge |
Component: | rubygem-rack | Assignee: | Jeroen van Meeuwen <vanmeeuwen+fedora> |
Status: | CLOSED EOL | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | el6 | CC: | vanmeeuwen+fedora |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | SecurityTracking |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Release Note | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-11-30 15:41:41 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
sean.edge
2014-05-13 11:33:37 UTC
Where to obtain the version that has the fix (1.1.6): http://rack.github.io/ https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/rack-devel/xKrHVWeNvDM/4ZGA576CnK4J Hi Sean, The whiteboard field of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2013-0262 has marked the epel versions as being not affected, possibly due to the "Versions affected: All versions after 1.4.0" text in the original report. If you believe it is affected I can make a tracking bug (although probably not really needed, since you have filed this one). Cheers, -- Murray McAllister / Red Hat Security Response Team (In reply to Murray McAllister from comment #2) > The whiteboard field of > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2013-0262 has marked the > epel versions as being not affected, possibly due to the "Versions affected: > All versions after 1.4.0" text in the original report. What about CVE-2013-0263? The rack webpage (look under the News headline) and google group post seem to indicate the 1.1.x series is affected by that one. "Some notes on CVE-2013-0263 that affects all prior versions:" Thanks, Sean (In reply to sean.edge from comment #3) > (In reply to Murray McAllister from comment #2) > > > The whiteboard field of > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2013-0262 has marked the > > epel versions as being not affected, possibly due to the "Versions affected: > > All versions after 1.4.0" text in the original report. > > What about CVE-2013-0263? The rack webpage (look under the News headline) > and google group post seem to indicate the 1.1.x series is affected by that > one. > > "Some notes on CVE-2013-0263 that affects all prior versions:" > > Thanks, > Sean It is affected by that one. The top level bug is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2013-0263 The EPEL specific one is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909088 (no movement on it yet) This message is a reminder that EPEL 6 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for EPEL 6 on 2020-11-30. It is our policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a 'version' of 'el6'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later EPEL version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before EPEL 6 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. This message is a reminder that EPEL 6 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for EPEL 6 on 2020-11-30. It is policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a 'version' of 'el6'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later EPEL version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before EPEL 6 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version, you are encouraged to change the 'version' to a later version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. EPEL el6 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2020-11-30. EPEL el6 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of EPEL please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. |