Bug 1098046

Summary: [Nagios] Status information for volume quota status service needs improvement when hard limit is reached
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage Reporter: Shruti Sampat <ssampat>
Component: gluster-nagios-addonsAssignee: Sahina Bose <sabose>
Status: CLOSED CANTFIX QA Contact: RHS-C QE <rhsc-qe-bugs>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rhgs-3.0CC: sankarshan
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: ZStream
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-01-30 11:48:11 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
screenshot none

Description Shruti Sampat 2014-05-15 07:23:06 UTC 
Description of problem:
------------------------

When the hard limit set on a directory in a volume, is reached, the status information for the volume quota status service is as follows - 

QUOTA:hard limit exceeded on /test1:

Notice the colon at the end of the message, which is not required.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
gluster-nagios-addons-0.1.0-57.git9d252a3.el6rhs.x86_64

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Cause the hard limit for a directory in a volume to be reached by writing data to the volume.
2. Check the volume quota status service.

Actual results:
The status information for the service appears as follows - "QUOTA:hard limit exceeded on /test1:"

Expected results:
The colon at the end of the message should be removed.

Additional info:
Comment 1 Shruti Sampat 2014-05-16 09:09:00 UTC 
Hi,

I have something to add, the following is the status information when soft limit is exceeded on some directories and hard limit on others - 

“QUOTA:hard limit exceeded on /test1: soft limit exceeded on /”

The soft limit list and the hard limit list need to be separated by a comma and not by a colon.
Comment 2 Sahina Bose 2014-05-19 10:44:51 UTC 
The hard limit list and soft limit list are separated by a semi-colon.

The dangling semi-colon at the end has been removed.

Posted - http://review.gluster.org/7798
Comment 4 Shruti Sampat 2014-05-29 12:56:57 UTC 
Created attachment 900346 [details]
screenshot
Comment 5 Shruti Sampat 2014-05-29 12:57:45 UTC 
Still seeing this issue. See attached screenshot.

Moving to ASSIGNED.
Comment 6 Dusmant 2014-06-03 09:56:54 UTC 
Removing it from Denali, as we agreed over e-mail -- this is not a blocker for RHSC Denali release.
Comment 7 Sahina Bose 2014-07-16 14:41:22 UTC 
Removing FutureFeature keyword as this is not an RFE
Comment 11 Sahina Bose 2018-01-30 11:48:11 UTC 
Thank you for your bug report. However, this bug is being closed as it's on a component where no further new development is being undertaken.