Bug 1098801
Summary: | Add README.Fedora explaining some intricacies of the default configuration | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Matěj Cepl <mcepl> |
Component: | bitlbee | Assignee: | Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla> |
Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | gholms, mcepl, redhat-bugzilla |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2019-11-29 00:30:29 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Matěj Cepl
2014-05-18 19:16:22 UTC
Meanwhile Rawhide is shipping forkdaemon rather daemon - this requires anyway that the SELinux part gets solved... (In reply to Robert Scheck from comment #1) > Meanwhile Rawhide is shipping forkdaemon rather daemon - this requires anyway > that the SELinux part gets solved... So, what do you suggest to do? Let's go with the forkdaemon, because it is the future (according to upstream). This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 22 development cycle. Changing version to '22'. More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora22 Meanwhile we're shipping upstream defaults for quite a while, so there shouldn't be any intricacies at the default configuration anymore. If you disagree, feel free to reopen or even to provide a patch suggestion. |