Bug 1099105
| Summary: | libguestfs Requires: /lib64/libldif-2.4.so.2 missing from openldap-2.4.39-6.el6.x86_64 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Richard W.M. Jones <rjones> |
| Component: | libguestfs | Assignee: | Pino Toscano <ptoscano> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 6.6 | CC: | bsarathy, eblake, lbezdick, leiwang, mbooth, mzatko, ptoscano, reda.benabed, snagar |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Regression |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | libguestfs-1.20.11-6.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2014-10-14 06:35:26 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Richard W.M. Jones
2014-05-19 13:42:44 UTC
The latest rebuild still failed to break the dependency: ---> Package libguestfs.x86_64 1:1.20.11-4.el6 will be an update --> Processing Dependency: /lib64/libldif-2.4.so.2 for package: 1:libguestfs-1.20.11-4.el6.x86_64 What's happening is that when we rebuild libguestfs, it is built against the old version of openldap from RHEL 6.5, not the new version. To see this, take a look at the root.log file from the libguestfs build: http://download.devel.redhat.com/brewroot/packages/libguestfs/1.20.11/4.el6/data/logs/x86_64/root.log and notice the version of openldap (2.4.23-34.el6_5.1) which is not the updated version (2.4.39). To fix this someone has to add a build override. I think in RHEL you actually have to ask rel-eng to do this (by emailing release-engineering). It cannot be done using Bodhi build-overrides as in Fedora. (Roll on RHEL 7.1 / supermin 5, which fixes all this nonsense ...) Scratch that bit about release-engineering. We can do it ourselves by running the following commands: pkg=openldap-2.4.39-8.el6 brew tag-pkg RHEL-6.6-temp-override $pkg brew wait-repo RHEL-6.6-build --build=$pkg I have done this and will kick off a rebuild later this evening. Note that the temp-override repo gets deleted frequently (every evening IIRC), so basically you have to do this before every libguestfs rebuild in RHEL 6. This bug needs PM and QA acks in order to perform the rebuild. There's a build going here: https://brewweb.devel.redhat.com/taskinfo?taskID=7595225 Pino, I have added the build above to the erratum and checked rpmdiffs. I am not able to add this BZ# to the erratum because it needs PM-ack (see: https://errata.devel.redhat.com/bugs/troubleshoot?bug_id=1099105) Hi, I still meet the problem with the latest libguestfs package,
# yum install openldap-2.4.39-6.el6.x86_64.rpm
Loaded plugins: product-id, security, subscription-manager
This system is not registered to Red Hat Subscription Management. You can use subscription-manager to register.
Setting up Install Process
Examining openldap-2.4.39-6.el6.x86_64.rpm: openldap-2.4.39-6.el6.x86_64
Marking openldap-2.4.39-6.el6.x86_64.rpm as an update to openldap-2.4.23-32.el6_4.1.x86_64
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package openldap.x86_64 0:2.4.23-32.el6_4.1 will be updated
---> Package openldap.x86_64 0:2.4.39-6.el6 will be an update
--> Processing Dependency: /lib64/libldif-2.4.so.2 for package: 1:libguestfs-1.20.11-8.el6.x86_64
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Package: 1:libguestfs-1.20.11-8.el6.x86_64 (@/libguestfs-1.20.11-8.el6.x86_64)
Requires: /lib64/libldif-2.4.so.2
Removing: openldap-2.4.23-32.el6_4.1.x86_64 (@anaconda-RedHatEnterpriseLinux-201311111358.x86_64/6.5)
Not found
Updated By: openldap-2.4.39-6.el6.x86_64 (/openldap-2.4.39-6.el6.x86_64)
Not found
You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
(In reply to bfan from comment #10) > Hi, I still meet the problem with the latest libguestfs package, > > # yum install openldap-2.4.39-6.el6.x86_64.rpm > Loaded plugins: product-id, security, subscription-manager > This system is not registered to Red Hat Subscription Management. You can > use subscription-manager to register. > Setting up Install Process > Examining openldap-2.4.39-6.el6.x86_64.rpm: openldap-2.4.39-6.el6.x86_64 > Marking openldap-2.4.39-6.el6.x86_64.rpm as an update to > openldap-2.4.23-32.el6_4.1.x86_64 > Resolving Dependencies > --> Running transaction check > ---> Package openldap.x86_64 0:2.4.23-32.el6_4.1 will be updated > ---> Package openldap.x86_64 0:2.4.39-6.el6 will be an update > --> Processing Dependency: /lib64/libldif-2.4.so.2 for package: > 1:libguestfs-1.20.11-8.el6.x86_64 > --> Finished Dependency Resolution > Error: Package: 1:libguestfs-1.20.11-8.el6.x86_64 > (@/libguestfs-1.20.11-8.el6.x86_64) > Requires: /lib64/libldif-2.4.so.2 > Removing: openldap-2.4.23-32.el6_4.1.x86_64 > (@anaconda-RedHatEnterpriseLinux-201311111358.x86_64/6.5) > Not found > Updated By: openldap-2.4.39-6.el6.x86_64 > (/openldap-2.4.39-6.el6.x86_64) > Not found > You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem > You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest You're using the wrong version of openldap. This package will now only work with the latest version of openldap (2.4.39-8): https://brewweb.devel.redhat.com/buildinfo?buildID=363428 It's not possible to build a package that works with both versions, at least, until we upgrade to supermin >= 5 (RHEL 7.1). Verified with libguestfs-1.20.11-8.el6.x86_64， openldap-2.4.39-8.el6.x86_64 Install and update succeed. Hello, I want to install the same package (openldap-2.4.39-8.el6.x86_64.rpm) , but i want to know if it's possible to rollback with (yum history undo xx ) My seconde question is : where can i download this package ? From RHN i have just (openldap-servers-2.4.39-8.el6.i686.rpm ) for 32-bit arch i686 ! Thank you for all Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1458.html |