Bug 1100008
| Summary: | [RFE] Don't provide a dtb by default but allow one to be specified if needed | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] Beaker | Reporter: | Bill Peck <bpeck> |
| Component: | lab controller | Assignee: | Dan Callaghan <dcallagh> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | tools-bugs <tools-bugs> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 0.16 | CC: | aigao, asaha, dcallagh, rmancy, xma |
| Target Milestone: | 0.17 | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2014-06-10 23:27:58 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Bill Peck
2014-05-21 19:19:58 UTC
Could we call the argument devicetree= instead of dtb=? That way it's a bit more obvious what it means, and it lines up with the GRUB command name which is also devicetree. Also I just wanted to double-check that there is no urgency to this, right? The devicetree line which is currently in the GRUB config isn't doing any harm, is it? This is just a matter of tidying up and removing the Mustang-specific filename. I was hoping this could go in 0.17. Would that be possible? I'll push a new patch Today that uses devicetree instead of dtb. (dtb stands for device tree binary) Okay thanks Bill. We will get it into 0.17. Beaker 0.17.0 has been released. |