Bug 1100875

Summary:	RFE: Please consider an f20 update of mozjs24
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Paulo Andrade <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade>
Component:	mozjs24	Assignee:	Debarshi Ray <debarshir>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	20	CC:	debarshir
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	All
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	0ad-0.0.16-2.fc19	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2014-05-28 13:51:48 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1101618

Description Paulo Andrade 2014-05-23 16:50:05 UTC

It is required to build 0ad-0.0.16.
Also please consider a backport for f19.

It it cannot be done, I would like to know the reason, so
I could try to ask for a bundling exception for f19 and f20,
as 0ad uses the system version optionally, and can build a
private mozjs24.

Comment 1 Paulo Andrade 2014-05-27 12:53:57 UTC

Sorry for pinging again so soon, but people really want
0ad in f20 :-)
I can work on it for f19 and f20 if you prefer, would need
you asking for the branches and giving me comainternership.

Comment 2 Tim Flubshi 2014-05-27 16:29:42 UTC

I would like to support this request, since mozjs17 is no longer maintained (no fixes for new security vulnerabilities provided).

See: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/organizations/faq/

Thus, please provide mozjs24 ESR for f20.

Comment 3 Debarshi Ray 2014-05-28 13:41:21 UTC

(In reply to Paulo Andrade from comment #1)
> Sorry for pinging again so soon, but people really want
> 0ad in f20 :-)
> I can work on it for f19 and f20 if you prefer, would need
> you asking for the branches and giving me comainternership.

Could you please ask for the ACLs in PackageDB?

Comment 4 Paulo Andrade 2014-05-28 13:50:00 UTC

I also asked for admin access as I believe it is required
to be able to ask for f19 and f20 branches

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests#Package_Change_Requests_for_existing_packages

but you can ask it yourself and give me then, later only
commit for f19 and f20.

Comment 5 Debarshi Ray 2014-05-28 13:51:48 UTC

Requested branches.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1051157 ***

Comment 6 Paulo Andrade 2014-05-29 13:51:49 UTC

Please give me permissions for f19 and f20 in pkgdb.

I asked roughly 30 min after the branches were created,
and still waiting for almost 24 hours.

The bug should not have been closed as there are not yet
updates in progress.

Comment 7 Debarshi Ray 2014-05-30 13:54:25 UTC

I built it earlier today.

Comment 8 Paulo Andrade 2014-05-30 16:39:33 UTC

(In reply to Debarshi Ray from comment #7)
> I built it earlier today.

Thanks. I was afk for some hours and had just started making
some tests in a f20 install.
I will also submit a build for f19, and make a temporary
buildroot overrides in both, so that 0ad can be built and made
as an update together with mozjs24 (without karma, in 7 days
would be available).

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2014-05-30 17:35:32 UTC

0ad-0.0.16-2.fc19,0ad-data-0.0.16-1.fc19,mozjs24-24.2.0-3.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/0ad-0.0.16-2.fc19,0ad-data-0.0.16-1.fc19,mozjs24-24.2.0-3.fc19

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2014-06-10 03:08:01 UTC

0ad-0.0.16-2.fc19, 0ad-data-0.0.16-1.fc19, mozjs24-24.2.0-3.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.