Bug 1101057
Summary: | CVE-2014-3152 v8: integer underflow fixed in Google Chrome 35.0.1916.114 [fedora-all] | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Murray McAllister <mmcallis> |
Component: | v8 | Assignee: | Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 20 | CC: | dac, jamielinux, jsmith.fedora, sgallagh, sparks, tcallawa, tchollingsworth, tomspur |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Security, SecurityTracking |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | fst_owner=dcafaro, fst_ping=2 | ||
Fixed In Version: | v8-3.14.5.10-18.fc21 | Doc Type: | Release Note |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2015-05-08 07:38:58 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1101056 |
Description
Murray McAllister
2014-05-26 02:54:37 UTC
Use the following update submission link to create the Bodhi request for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as this tracking bug. This will ensure that all associated bugs get updated when new packages are pushed to stable. IMPORTANT: ensure that the "Close bugs when update is stable" option remains checked. Bodhi update submission link: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/new/?type_=security&bugs=1101056,1101057 ARM specific, this can not affect Fedora i686 and x86_64 architectures. It may affect armv7hl, I haven't investigated further. Found the upstream fix here: https://codereview.chromium.org/219473002 I would assume this affects all fedora versions of v8 since it affects all Google V8 before 3.25.28.16. And I see that Fedora 21 is only at version v8-3.14.5.10-14.fc21.armv7hl. Would need to be backported. Can a fix for this be shipped? Can an update be pushed for this package? I think I know how to backport the fix, but since it only applies to ARM, I cannot test to see if it resolves it. Eric, can you? Hmm... I don't seem to have any ARM devices around any more. Let me see if I can find a tester. By the way, this was reduced from Important to Moderate so I've reduced the impact on the ticket accordingly. It's possible I could set this up on my VM environment at home: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/HowToQemu Might be enough to test this (ARM VM with libvirt). Id be happy to test on an ARM device, if you can give me a patch to test and a set of steps to try to reproduce the issue. v8-3.14.5.10-18.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/v8-3.14.5.10-18.fc22 v8-3.14.5.10-18.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/v8-3.14.5.10-18.fc21 v8-3.14.5.10-18.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/v8-3.14.5.10-18.fc20 Please test that. I went ahead and pushed it as an update because of the minimal risk envelope (it's unlikely I made anything _worse_ on ARM), but I'll wait to hear confirmation that it resolves the CVE before I push to stable. Package v8-3.14.5.10-18.fc21: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing v8-3.14.5.10-18.fc21' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-6845/v8-3.14.5.10-18.fc21 then log in and leave karma (feedback). Just to note, this update is waiting for someone to explicitly test it before I will push it to stable. (In reply to Jared Smith from comment #10) > Id be happy to test on an ARM device, if you can give me a patch to test and > a set of steps to try to reproduce the issue. Jared are you going to be able to test this? I tried the regress-358057.js from the upstream commit on arm03-packager00.cloud.fedoraproject.org and it runs without asserting with both v8-1:3.14.5.10-17.fc21.armv7hl and v8-1:3.14.5.10-18.fc21.armv7hl. It doesn't seem to break anything though. I assume that is the same regress-358057.js from the upstream google code I linked to above. v8-3.14.5.10-18.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. v8-3.14.5.10-18.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. v8-3.14.5.10-18.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |