Bug 1101399

Summary: rebase libsoup to 2.34
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Tomas Pelka <tpelka>
Component: libsoupAssignee: Dan Winship <danw>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Desktop QE <desktop-qa-list>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.6CC: jkoten, mcrha, tlavigne, tpopela
Target Milestone: betaKeywords: Rebase
Target Release: 6.6   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: libsoup-2.34.3-2.el6 Doc Type: Rebase: Bug Fixes and Enhancements
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-10-14 07:48:44 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1101398, 1101418, 1139274    
Bug Blocks: 1033151, 1127304    

Description Tomas Pelka 2014-05-27 06:37:53 UTC 
Description of problem:
Rebase libsoup to version 2.34 due to webkit 1.4 dep.
Comment 1 Dan Winship 2014-06-02 14:27:17 UTC 
Assuming the dependencies get rebased, this shouldn't be too much work.

However, this would definitely require re-testing the libsoup-using parts of evolution as well. (At least evolution-exchange and webcal. I'm not sure if RHEL6's evo has CalDAV support?)
Comment 2 Milan Crha 2014-06-02 14:46:00 UTC 
(In reply to Dan Winship from comment #1)
> However, this would definitely require re-testing the libsoup-using parts of
> evolution as well. (At least evolution-exchange and webcal. I'm not sure if
> RHEL6's evo has CalDAV support?)

From evolution-data-server WebDAV books, CalDAV and On The Web calendars. Then evolution-exchange and evolution-ews for sure. Maybe I missed some parts.
Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2014-10-14 07:48:44 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1561.html