Bug 1102967

Summary: [abrt] prelink: raise(): prelink killed by SIGABRT
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Michael Dempsey <bluestealth001>
Component: prelinkAssignee: Jakub Jelinek <jakub>
Status: CLOSED EOL QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 22CC: jakub, loganjerry, mjw, vindicators
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Unspecified   
URL: https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/reports/bthash/6baabe5905b19d9a9d0540ef6d4ebef73ed10497
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:bb90d58c56db13f01523e2f9ef8afd95f10d1c0e
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-07-19 11:35:19 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace
none
File: cgroup
none
File: core_backtrace
none
File: dso_list
none
File: environ
none
File: limits
none
File: maps
none
File: open_fds
none
File: proc_pid_status
none
File: var_log_messages none

Description Michael Dempsey 2014-05-30 00:17:12 UTC
Version-Release number of selected component:
prelink-0.5.0-1.fc20

Additional info:
reporter:       libreport-2.2.2
backtrace_rating: 4
cmdline:        /usr/sbin/prelink -av -mR -q
crash_function: raise
executable:     /usr/sbin/prelink
kernel:         3.15.0-0.rc7.git0.1.fc21.x86_64
runlevel:       N 5
type:           CCpp
uid:            0

Truncated backtrace:
Thread no. 1 (9 frames)
 #0 raise
 #1 abort
 #2 __assert_fail_base
 #3 __assert_fail
 #4 reopen_dso at dso.c:877
 #5 prelink_exec at exec.c:441
 #6 prelink at prelink.c:948
 #7 prelink_ent at doit.c:132
 #8 prelink_all at doit.c:253

Potential duplicate: bug 1003151

Comment 1 Michael Dempsey 2014-05-30 00:17:15 UTC
Created attachment 900561 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Michael Dempsey 2014-05-30 00:17:17 UTC
Created attachment 900562 [details]
File: cgroup

Comment 3 Michael Dempsey 2014-05-30 00:17:19 UTC
Created attachment 900563 [details]
File: core_backtrace

Comment 4 Michael Dempsey 2014-05-30 00:17:21 UTC
Created attachment 900564 [details]
File: dso_list

Comment 5 Michael Dempsey 2014-05-30 00:17:23 UTC
Created attachment 900565 [details]
File: environ

Comment 6 Michael Dempsey 2014-05-30 00:17:24 UTC
Created attachment 900566 [details]
File: limits

Comment 7 Michael Dempsey 2014-05-30 00:17:26 UTC
Created attachment 900567 [details]
File: maps

Comment 8 Michael Dempsey 2014-05-30 00:17:28 UTC
Created attachment 900568 [details]
File: open_fds

Comment 9 Michael Dempsey 2014-05-30 00:17:29 UTC
Created attachment 900569 [details]
File: proc_pid_status

Comment 10 Michael Dempsey 2014-05-30 00:17:31 UTC
Created attachment 900570 [details]
File: var_log_messages

Comment 11 Jerry James 2014-08-01 19:45:33 UTC
Another user experienced a similar problem:

One of my packages, sphinxtrain, is causing prelink to fail an assertion on Rawhide (and probably F21, too, but I haven't checked).  When the daily cron job to run prelink kicks off, it fails upon reaching /usr/libexec/sphinxtrain/prunetree.  The failed assertion is on line 1512 of dso.c:

    assert (!RELOCATE_SCN (dso->shdr[i].sh_flags));

Unfortunately, gdb is not much help:

(gdb) print dso->shdr[i].sh_flags
value has been optimized out
(gdb) print i
$1 = <optimized out>
(gdb) print first_nonalloc
$2 = <optimized out>

Does this mean that something is wrong with the executable?  Thanks.

reporter:       libreport-2.2.3
backtrace_rating: 4
cmdline:        /usr/sbin/prelink -av -mR -q
crash_function: raise
executable:     /usr/sbin/prelink
kernel:         3.16.0-0.rc5.git1.1.fc22.x86_64
package:        prelink-0.5.0-1.fc20
reason:         prelink killed by SIGABRT
runlevel:       N 5
type:           CCpp
uid:            0

Comment 12 Jerry James 2014-09-11 16:21:59 UTC
Can I provide any additional information to help track this down?  What does the failed assertion actually mean?

Comment 13 Jaroslav Reznik 2015-03-03 15:51:26 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 22 development cycle.
Changing version to '22'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora22

Comment 14 Fedora End Of Life 2016-07-19 11:35:19 UTC
Fedora 22 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2016-07-19. Fedora 22 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.