Bug 1103457

Summary:	Review Request: liquid-dsp - Software-Defined Radio Digital Signal Processing Library
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Florian Tani <floriantani>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED DEFERRED	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	collura, msuchy, package-review
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-07-29 13:20:00 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	201449

Description Florian Tani 2014-06-01 00:52:21 UTC

Spec URL: http://openlabs.cc/linux/fedora/liquid-dsp/liquid-dsp.spec
SRPM URL: http://openlabs.cc/linux/fedora/liquid-dsp/liquid-dsp-1.2.0-1.fc18.src.rpm
Description: liquid-dsp is a free and open-source digital signal processing (DSP)library designed specifically for software-defined radios on embedded platforms.
The aim is to provide a lightweight DSP library that does not rely on a myriad of external dependencies or proprietary and otherwise cumbersome frameworks. 
All signal processing elements are designed to be flexible, scalable, and dynamic, including filters, filter design,oscillators, modems, synchronizers, and complex mathematical operations.

Fedora Account System Username: ftani

Comment 1 Michael Schwendt 2014-06-05 19:30:51 UTC

FAS says:

| Error!
| 
| The following error(s) have occurred with your request:
| 
|    username: 'ftani' does not exist.

It seems you meant: floriantani

Comment 2 Michael Schwendt 2014-06-05 19:33:41 UTC

Btw, same here as with your other review request (bug 1092431):

| 
| %files
| %doc COPYING HISTORY README.md TROUBLESHOOTING
| 

The built package does not include anything other than these %doc files. That's not the only mistake in this spec file, but it tells that you haven't tested your packages at all. :-(

Comment 3 Miroslav Suchý 2015-10-20 20:46:52 UTC

Florian, please update and test you spec and srpm before applying.
Here are some pointers:
https://fedorahosted.org/copr/wiki/UserDocs#HowcanIpackagesoftwareasRPM

Comment 4 Miroslav Suchý 2016-07-29 13:20:00 UTC

No response so far. Closing. Please reopen if you want to continue.