Bug 110360
Summary: | kernel-hugemem available on RHEL3 ES channel | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Network | Reporter: | Dave Maley <dmaley> |
Component: | RHN/Channels | Assignee: | dff <dff> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fanny Augustin <fmoquete> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | RHN Stable | CC: | rhn-bugs |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | https://rhn.redhat.com/network/software/channels/packages.pxt?cid=1187&filter_string=kernel&alphabar_column=NVRE | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2003-12-11 21:03:13 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Dave Maley
2003-11-18 19:59:46 UTC
Not exactly an rhn problem. Not exactly a compose problem either since the ES packages are identical to the AS packages aside from redhat-release, comps, and anaconda-product. Tim Reassigning to dff since he likes these types of problems. I misread this bug the first time around. RHEL 3 _should_ have all of the kernel packages in all variants. The "enforcing" of SLA policies is done by the new redhat-support-check utility in initscripts, not by witholding packages. This is different from RHEL 2.1, where we took the approach of witholding kernel-enterprise,kernel-summit from ES and kernel-summit from WS. So, not a bug. Interestingly, the bug that I originally thought this was reporting (that the kernel-enterprise and kernel-summit packages had crept back into the RHEL 2.1 ES, WS channels) actually does exist. *sigh* |