Bug 1103939

Summary: [RFE] Provide package group functionality via Satellite 6 cli
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: Dave Sullivan <dsulliva>
Component: HammerAssignee: Katello Bug Bin <katello-bugs>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Katello QA List <katello-qa-list>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 6.0.3CC: mmccune, omaciel, pladd, xdmoon
Target Milestone: UnspecifiedKeywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-04-17 18:17:40 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 672946, 1316897    

Description Dave Sullivan 2014-06-03 00:07:28 UTC
1. Proposed title of this feature request


Provide package group functionality via satellite 6 cli

2. Who is the customer behind the request?
Account name: 		Nomura
Customer segment: 	FSI
TAM/SRM customer: 	yes
Strategic Customer: 	yes


3. What is the nature and description of the request?

Need support for package group control via cli



I am looking for an option using which i can use content_upload feature to create

package group and also able to remove or add rpms to that particular package group.

i saw this is available in Pupl, not sure why it's missng here

pulp-admin -u admin -p admin rpm repo uploads group



4. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)

customer uses cli heavily

5. How would the customer like to achieve this? (List the functional
requirements here)

allow hammer cli to provide functionality of pulp-admin


6. For each functional requirement listed in question 5, specify how Red Hat
and the customer can test to confirm the requirement is successfully
implemented.

redhat implement and customer validate


7. Is there already an existing RFE upstream or in Red Hat bugzilla?

http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/4214


8. Does the customer have any specific timeline dependencies?

they listed this a prioritized request


9. Is the sales team involved in this request and do they have any additional input?

Nope


10. List any affected packages or components.

[root@sun-x4-2l-1 ~]# rpm -qa | grep hammer
rubygem-hammer_cli_foreman-0.1.1-5.el6sat.noarch
rubygem-hammer_cli_katello-0.0.4-4.el6sat.noarch
rubygem-hammer_cli-0.1.1-2.el6sat.noarch
rubygem-hammer_cli_foreman_tasks-0.0.3-2.el6sat.noarch


11. Would the customer be able to assist in testing this functionality if
implemented?
yes

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2014-06-03 00:34:46 UTC
Since this issue was entered in Red Hat Bugzilla, the release flag has been
set to ? to ensure that it is properly evaluated for this release.

Comment 7 Bryan Kearney 2016-07-08 20:42:04 UTC
Per 6.3 planning, moving out non acked bugs to the backlog

Comment 9 Og Maciel 2017-04-17 18:17:40 UTC
This is an older bug which I do not envision being addressed in the near term. I am closing this out. If you believe doing so is an issue, please feel free to re-open and provide additional business information. Thank you.