Bug 1105090
| Summary: | unrtf templates not found | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Arne de Bruijn <redhat> |
| Component: | unrtf | Assignee: | Ken Dreyer <ktdreyer> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | el6 | CC: | ktdreyer |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2014-06-07 01:50:57 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
Hi Arne, thanks for the bug report. As it turns out this bug looks very similar to 1060513 , "conf files are not found". If you don't mind I'm going to close this one as a duplicate of that one. As described in the other bug, there is a newer unrtf package in epel-testing, and when that update reaches the end of its two week testing period, I can push it to epel's stable repo. If you get a chance to check out the package in epel-testing, I would greatly welcome your feedback. Feel free to comment in Bodhi or on that original bug in Bugzilla. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1060513 *** |
Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): unrtf-0.21.5-1.el6 How reproducible: echo '{}'|unrtf Actual results (error message): failed to find html.conf in search path dirs Expected results: <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN> ... Additional info: unrtf looks for html.conf in /usr/share/unrtf, but the package places the file in /etc/unrtf. unrtf used to use a hardcoded conf-file path which was replaced in the .spec file. But the latest version has a macro CONFIG_DIR defined to PKGDATADIR. Since the conf files are more static template files than user configurable files PKGDATADIR seems right.