Bug 1106700

Summary: z88dk: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Dennis Gilmore <dennis>
Component: z88dkAssignee: Kevin Kofler <kevin>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: kevin, pbrobinson
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-02-22 00:25:54 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1105908    
Attachments:
Description Flags
build.log
none
root.log
none
state.log none

Description Dennis Gilmore 2014-06-09 17:08:47 UTC 
Your package z88dk failed to build from source in current rawhide.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6977520

For details on mass rebuild see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass_Rebuild
Comment 1 Dennis Gilmore 2014-06-09 17:08:51 UTC 
Created attachment 905063 [details]
build.log
Comment 2 Dennis Gilmore 2014-06-09 17:08:53 UTC 
Created attachment 905064 [details]
root.log
Comment 3 Dennis Gilmore 2014-06-09 17:08:54 UTC 
Created attachment 905065 [details]
state.log
Comment 4 Peter Robinson 2015-02-21 17:50:05 UTC 
Kevin: could you look at the FTBFS or retire it if it's dead/not worth fixing or similar?
Comment 5 Kevin Kofler 2015-02-22 00:24:47 UTC 
This, like several other open z88dk issues (including a licensing issue), is fixed in upstream's current CVS HEAD, I was hoping that they'd finally do a new upstream release, but there hasn't been one since 2012 (despite all the activity in CVS). :-( I'll probably have to bite the bullet and package one of their nightlies or just take a snapshot directly from CVS.
Comment 6 Kevin Kofler 2015-02-22 00:25:54 UTC 
Actually, one of the 2 open issues is this exact same one. (The other is the licensing issue.)

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1037409 ***