Bug 1106919
Summary: | maven-fragments != maven-metadata | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jerry James <loganjerry> |
Component: | javapackages-tools | Assignee: | Mikolaj Izdebski <mizdebsk> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | dtardon, java-sig-commits, mizdebsk, msimacek, msrb |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2014-06-23 11:44:32 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Jerry James
2014-06-09 18:26:49 UTC
The migration from depmaps to metadata was intentional. Documentation probably needs to be revised. (In reply to Mikolaj Izdebski from comment #1) > The migration from depmaps to metadata was intentional. Documentation > probably needs to be revised. Since this change actually breaks packages, maybe an announcement to fedora-devel would not be out of place? (In reply to David Tardon from comment #2) > (In reply to Mikolaj Izdebski from comment #1) > > The migration from depmaps to metadata was intentional. Documentation > > probably needs to be revised. > > Since this change actually breaks packages, maybe an announcement to > fedora-devel would not be out of place? Mikolaj formally announced this change in May, I believe: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/java-devel/2014-May/005243.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/java-devel/2014-May/005248.html (In reply to Mat Booth from comment #3) > Mikolaj formally announced this change in May, I believe: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/java-devel/2014-May/005243.html > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/java-devel/2014-May/005248.html I was talking about fedora-devel. Not all package maintainers read java-devel. This was a problem with our release script which wasn't uploading the documentation due to a problem with group permissions at fedorahosted.org [1], which has just been fixed. I have uploaded the new documentation. It doesn't recommend using %{_mavendepmapfragdir} and it contains a section [2] describing migration from the legacy %{_mavendepmapfragdir} directory. Closing as NOTABUG as this wasn't a bug in the package, but a problem with website. [1] https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/4410 [2] https://fedorahosted.org/released/javapackages/doc/#_add_maven_depmap_macro_2 |