Bug 110710

Summary: Winkey + M does not minimize all windows.
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Nick Marsh <nmarsh1>
Component: control-centerAssignee: Ray Strode [halfline] <rstrode>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: David Lawrence <dkl>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideKeywords: FutureFeature
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-05-31 19:38:16 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Description Nick Marsh 2003-11-23 23:35:22 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.1)

Description of problem:
Pressing the Winkey + M does not minimize all windows. I am pretty
sure this used to work in previous versions.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open several windows (mozilla, terminal, etc).
2. Press Winkey + M

Actual Results:  Nothing happens.

Expected Results:  Should be a shrotcut to minimize all windows (show

Additional info:

Comment 1 Nick Marsh 2004-03-15 14:53:51 UTC
Changing to FC2 T1.

Comment 2 Nick Marsh 2004-04-09 00:52:19 UTC
The gnome-keyboard applet has a feature to do this, but it will only
accept the Winkey by itself. It should allow you to set Winkey + M
much like you would use Ctrl + someting for other functions. It's a
design flaw. Should I file this enhancment upstream? Please advise.

Comment 3 Ray Strode [halfline] 2005-05-12 15:53:12 UTC
I'm going through bugs assigned to me and attempting to clean some of the older,
fixed ones up.

This bug hasn't changed in over a year old now.  Are you still seeing the problem? 

(This a batch message is being sent to all my bugs that haven't changed in a year)

Comment 4 Ray Strode [halfline] 2005-05-31 19:38:16 UTC

This bug has been in the NEEDINFO state for at least a couple of weeks now.  I'm
going to close the bug, but if you can provide the required information feel
free to open a new report.


(This is a mass message being sent to a bunch of bug reports)