Bug 1108439
| Summary: | [RFE][swift]: Efficient Replication for Global Distributed Cluster | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat OpenStack | Reporter: | RHOS Integration <rhos-integ> |
| Component: | openstack-swift | Assignee: | Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Mike Abrams <mabrams> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | unspecified | CC: | derekh, mabrams, markmc, nlevinki, panbalag, scohen, sgotliv, srevivo, thiago, zaitcev |
| Target Milestone: | z5 | Keywords: | FutureFeature, Reopened, Triaged, ZStream |
| Target Release: | 7.0 (Kilo) | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| URL: | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/swift/+spec/efficient-replication | ||
| Whiteboard: | upstream_milestone_none upstream_definition_new upstream_status_unknown | ||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Release Note | |
| Doc Text: |
Efficient replication of distributed regions is now possible. Existing replication sends data over unnecessarily. For example, in case of two regions and replication factor of four, a typical spread is to have two replicas per region, assuming uniform weights. If the long-haul link goes down and up, replicators send two copies of every outstanding object across regions. This is not necessary. If only one copy is sent over, replicators of the remote region restore complete redundancy without using the long-haul bandwidth.
This update ensures stable performance during a recovery after an outage in a multi-region cluster. It has no effect inside a one-region datacenter.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-08-31 15:44:29 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
RHOS Integration
2014-06-12 04:09:33 UTC
Main review: I5d990444d7977f4127bb37f9256212c893438df1 https://review.openstack.org/99824 Update: Ie8f75ed65c7bfefbb18ddccd9fe0e41b72dca0a4 https://review.openstack.org/157290 Update: Ic59d998a3e36a3eb3e509d9fdf7096e812281357 https://review.openstack.org/159683 (wrote a more concise doc, see "Doc Text" field in the bug) |