|Summary:||[virtio-win][netkvm]win7-32 guest bsod(8e) while performing long (several hours) netperf transfer with mq=on|
|Product:||Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7||Reporter:||lijin <lijin>|
|Component:||virtio-win||Assignee:||Dmitry Fleytman <dfleytma>|
|Status:||CLOSED ERRATA||QA Contact:||Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs>|
|Version:||7.0||CC:||ghammer, hhuang, knoel, lijin, mdeng, michen, rbalakri, virt-maint, vrozenfe, yvugenfi|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Last Closed:||2015-11-24 08:42:13 UTC||Type:||Bug|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Cloudforms Team:||---||Target Upstream Version:|
Description lijin 2014-06-19 06:56:16 UTC
Description of problem: win7-32 guest bsod(8e) while performing long (several hours) transfer with netperf Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): virtio-win-prewhql-86 qemu-kvm-rhev-1.5.3-60.el7ev.x86_64 kernel-3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64 spice-server-0.12.4-5.el7.x86_64 How reproducible: 3/3 Steps to Reproduce: 1.boot win7-32 guest: /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm -cpu SandyBridge -m 2G -smp 2 -usb -device usb-tablet -boot menu=on -drive file=win7-32.qcow2,format=qcow2,if=none,id=drive-ide0-0-0,werror=stop,rerror=stop,cache=none,media=disk -device ide-drive,drive=drive-ide0-0-0,id=ide0-0-0 -rtc base=localtime,clock=host,driftfix=slew -no-kvm-pit-reinjection -chardev socket,id=b111a,path=/tmp/w2k8-R2-nic,server,nowait -mon chardev=b111a,mode=readline -name w2k8-R2-nic -monitor stdio -spice disable-ticketing,port=5900 -vga qxl -global PIIX4_PM.disable_s3=0 -global PIIX4_PM.disable_s4=0 -chardev socket,path=/tmp/tt-1-1,server,nowait,id=tt-1-1 -mon mode=readline,chardev=tt-1-1 -global PIIX4_PM.disable_s3=0 -global PIIX4_PM.disable_s4=0 -qmp tcp::444,server -netdev tap,id=hostnet0,vhost=on,script=/etc/qemu-ifup -device virtio-net-pci,vectors=1,mq=on,netdev=hostnet0,mac=52-54-00-02-9a-80,id=net0 2.do netperf test in guest for a long time: for /l %j in (1,1,100000) do for /d %i in (32 64 128 256 512 1024 2048 4096 8192 16384 32768) do netperf.exe -H $SERVER_IP -c -C -t tcp_stream -f m -l 30s -- -m %i done done Actual results: guest bsod with 8e code Expected results: no bsod,network still alive after netperf test. Additional info: I tried three times,all bsod with 8e code,but there is a little difference in the windbg analyze info,I will uplode detailed info later.
Comment 1 lijin 2014-06-19 06:58:06 UTC
Created attachment 910274 [details] analyze -v info for the first bsod
Comment 2 lijin 2014-06-19 06:58:58 UTC
Created attachment 910275 [details] analyze -v info for the second bsod
Comment 3 lijin 2014-06-19 06:59:35 UTC
Created attachment 910276 [details] analyze -v info for the third bsod
Comment 6 Yan Vugenfirer 2014-06-19 12:39:03 UTC
Do I understand correctly that driver verifier was enabled during the test? Thanks, Yan.
Comment 7 lijin 2014-06-20 02:11:28 UTC
(In reply to Yan Vugenfirer from comment #6) > Do I understand correctly that driver verifier was enabled during the test? > > > Thanks, > Yan. yes,I enabled the driver verifier during the test. And yesterday I tried boot guest with virtio-net-pci without mq=on,guest works fine after 10 hours netperf,no bsod
Comment 8 Yan Vugenfirer 2014-06-22 07:27:46 UTC
(In reply to lijin from comment #7) > (In reply to Yan Vugenfirer from comment #6) > > Do I understand correctly that driver verifier was enabled during the test? > > > > > > Thanks, > > Yan. > > yes,I enabled the driver verifier during the test. > And yesterday I tried boot guest with virtio-net-pci without mq=on,guest > works fine after 10 hours netperf,no bsod Thank you for the information.
Comment 9 Yan Vugenfirer 2014-06-22 07:44:04 UTC
Hi, Could you please test build 82 (https://brewweb.devel.redhat.com/buildinfo?buildID=355375) to check if it is a regression? Thank you, Yan.
Comment 10 lijin 2014-06-23 01:16:06 UTC
(In reply to Yan Vugenfirer from comment #9) > Hi, > > Could you please test build 82 > (https://brewweb.devel.redhat.com/buildinfo?buildID=355375) to check if it > is a regression? > > Thank you, > Yan. OK,I will update the result after the test finish,might need a few hours.
Comment 11 lijin 2014-06-23 08:09:50 UTC
(In reply to Yan Vugenfirer from comment #9) > Hi, > > Could you please test build 82 > (https://brewweb.devel.redhat.com/buildinfo?buildID=355375) to check if it > is a regression? > > Thank you, > Yan. try with build82 twice,hit this issue once,so it's not a regression bug
Comment 12 Yan Vugenfirer 2014-06-23 09:20:10 UTC
Comment 13 Mike Cao 2014-06-27 10:11:08 UTC
Pls retest it w/ virtio-win-1.7-1 to see whether it is a regression to customers
Comment 14 lijin 2014-07-02 02:37:41 UTC
(In reply to Mike Cao from comment #13) > Pls retest it w/ virtio-win-1.7-1 to see whether it is a regression to > customers retest twice with virtio-win-1.7.1-1.el7.noarch,guest works well,no bsod
Comment 16 lijin 2014-09-28 02:43:25 UTC
retest with build 92,steps same as comment#0,after more than 10 hours' netperf testing,guest still works well package info: kernel-3.10.0-165.el7.x86_64 qemu-kvm-rhev-2.1.0-4.el7.x86_64 seabios-1.7.5-5.el7.x86_64 spice-server-0.12.4-5.el7.x86_64 virtio-win-prehql-92
Comment 24 errata-xmlrpc 2015-11-24 08:42:13 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2513.html